Opinion: Ending Search For MH370 Is Wrong | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.06.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.08.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.09.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.10.25

Thu, Jan 19, 2017

Opinion: Ending Search For MH370 Is Wrong

Too Many Unanswered Questions In The Airliner's Disappearance

Three governments have spent about $160 million searching for the wreckage of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which vanished from radar on a flight from Beijing to Kuala Lumpur on March 8, 2014. On Tuesday, the governments of China, Malaysia an Australia called off the search.

That was the wrong decision, says Forbes contributor John Goglia.

The obvious reason is the families of those lost when the airliner went down. They may never have closure about what might have happened to their loved ones.

But equally as, if not more important is an opportunity to examine the wreckage to determine what went wrong, Goglia says. Was there a mechanical issue with the airplane that might be systemic to the Boeing 777, or other aircraft, given that suppliers often sell components to more than one manufacturer.

There is also the possibility that some act of terrorism brought the airplane down.

Goglia says that while the price of finding the airplane is high, the cost of not knowing what happened to the aircraft could be significantly higher if another airplane meets a similar fate.

(Image from file. Not accident aircraft)

FMI: Full Article

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.16.25)

“This integration marks a significant step forward in cockpit connectivity and safety. It is one of few solutions offered to business aviation and rotorcraft operators that p>[...]

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.16.25): Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS)

Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) An EFVS is an installed aircraft system which uses an electronic means to provide a display of the forward external scene topography (the natur>[...]

True Blue Power and Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics Power NBAA25 Coverage

Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics and True Blue Power ANN's NBAA 2025 Coverage... Visit Them At Booth #3436 True Blue Power Unveils 50 Amp-hour Lithium-ion, Main Ship Battery >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Bellanca 17-30A

Shortly After Takeoff, The Engine Completely Lost Power Analysis: The pilot reported that the engine start, run-up, and takeoff were without incident. However, shortly after takeof>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC