DJI Fights Against Proposed US Drone Ban | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.06.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.08.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.09.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.10.25

Sat, Oct 18, 2025

DJI Fights Against Proposed US Drone Ban

Drone Maker Appeals Pentagon’s Decision to Label It a ‘Chinese Military Company’

Further fueling a year-long legal feud, world-famous drone maker DJI is taking its ‘Chinese Military Company’ label back to the Pentagon in hopes of regaining access to the US market. Judges decided just last month to uphold the Department of Defense’s claims that the company is tied to the Chinese Communist Party despite dismissing much of the evidence.

The ruling, issued by US District Judge Paul Friedman, came in the form of a 49-page opinion that rejected most of the Defense Department’s accusations, including claims that DJI is owned by, controlled by, or directly affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party. He also dismissed arguments that the company operates out of any so-called “military-civil fusion” zone. Still, the court allowed DJI’s inclusion on the blacklist to stand due to two narrower factors: its status as a Chinese National Enterprise Technology Center (a government-recognized innovation award) and the fact that DJI drones have the potential to serve both civil and military applications.

DJI company insists the NETC designation is routine for large Chinese tech firms and has nothing to do with the military. As for dual-use, DJI notes that the same logic could apply to nearly any modern technology, from smartphones to mapping software.

The company’s legal fight began in 2024, when it accused the Pentagon of applying the label without evidence. DJI also argued selective enforcement, pointing out that several Western companies with Chinese partnerships have similar government recognitions but remain untouched. The court, however, gave the Pentagon wide discretion in determining which companies appear on the list… which proved decisive in dismissing DJI’s claims.

DJI maintains that its drones are for peaceful use, emphasizing safeguards such as geofencing and user restrictions that prevent operation in restricted zones. It has also been publicly critical of the use of its products in warfare, reiterating that it was the “first drone company to publicly denounce and actively discourage the combat use of its products, and it has never manufactured military equipment nor marketed drones for combat.”

While DJI drones remain legal to operate in the US, the Pentagon’s classification is quickly gaining traction. Federal agencies will be barred from buying DJI products starting in 2026, and some new models have been kept from the US market altogether.

FMI: www.dji.com

Advertisement

More News

True Blue Power and Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics Power NBAA25 Coverage

Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics and True Blue Power ANN's NBAA 2025 Coverage... Visit Them At Booth #3436 True Blue Power Introduces New 45-watt Charging Ports for 14- and 2>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.15.25): En Route Automation System (EAS)

En Route Automation System (EAS) The complex integrated environment consisting of situation display systems, surveillance systems and flight data processing, remote devices, decisi>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.15.25)

“Our Kodiak aircraft family is uniquely designed to meet the rigorous demands of such deployments, bringing short takeoff and landing performance, robust cargo capacity and e>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.15.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Society of Air Safety Investigators (ASASI) The Australian Society of Air Safety Investigators (ASASI) was formed in 1978 after an inaugural meeting held in M>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Jeremy S Lezin Just SuperSTOL

Left Main Landing Gear Struck A Bush, And The Right Wingtip Impacted The Ground Analysis: According to the pilot of the tailwheel-equipped airplane, he noticed that the engine oil >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC