Tue, Jun 04, 2024
Improper Repair Of A (Canopy) Crack By Maintenance Personnel...
Location: Woodstock, Virginia Accident Number: ERA23LA013
Date & Time: October 8, 2022, 09:50 Local Registration: N520RJ
Aircraft: Schempp-Hirth Discus CS Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Part(s) separation from AC Injuries: 1 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

Analysis: The pilot reported that the glider was at 3,700 ft mean sea level when the canopy suddenly, without warning, separated from the glider. He subsequently landed uneventfully at his intended destination airport.
Review of maintenance records revealed that about 2 years before the accident, a maintenance facility stop-drilled a hole to correct a canopy crack at the rear hinge along the glide frame. Metallurgical examination revealed that the drilled hole appeared to halt progression of the original crack along its initial propagation direction. However, both the new primary separation crack and a secondary crack propagated from the hole in diametrically opposite directions, which suggests they likely developed due to a stress state along the same plane. Additionally, both cracks propagated from internal surface corners of the hole, indicating the corners likely acted as stress risers that facilitated crack initiation.
There was no approved method from the glider manufacturer to stop-drill a hole in plexiglass; however, manufacturer approval was not required as the glider was registered in the experimental category. The glider manufacturer stated that it was common practice for cracks in the plexiglass to be drilled-out to stop the crack progression as a temporary solution; however, for a proper repair, the canopy must be removed and re-glued.
The presence of multiple cracks propagating out of the same stress riser of the internal hole corner indicated that the specific hole drilled did not prevent subsequent progression of further cracking and the eventual separation of the canopy.
Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- Improper repair of a crack by maintenance personnel, which resulted in a subsequent failure of the glider canopy.
More News
From 2023 (YouTube Edition): A Moniker Well-Chosen Founded in 2021 by serial entrepreneur David Mayman and headquartered in New York City, Mayman Aerospace is the designer and manu>[...]
The Controller Provided The Pilot With A Low Altitude Alert And The Altimeter Setting That Was Current At The Time On October 13, 2025, at about 0815 eastern daylight time, a Socat>[...]
Outer Marker A marker beacon at or near the glideslope intercept altitude of an ILS approach. It is keyed to transmit two dashes per second on a 400 Hz tone, which is received aura>[...]
Aero Linx: Seaplane Pilots Association The Seaplane Pilots Association is the only organization in the world solely focused on representing the interests of seaplane pilots, owners>[...]
“While business aviation is fully included in the FAA’s traffic reductions, we know that our sector will continue to pursue mandatory and voluntary means to ensure we a>[...]