House Passes Bill Restricting DJI Drone Use | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

House Passes Bill Restricting DJI Drone Use

Act Would Ban New DJI Tech From U.S. Operations

On September 9, the House of Representatives passed H.R.2864: the Countering CCP Drones Act. This would add future equipment made by DJI technologies to the FCC’s Covered List on the premise that it poses a risk to U.S. national security.

The Countering CCP Drones Act would essentially ban UAS and related tech produced by DJI from operating on U.S. telecommunications infrastructure. This trails several “inaccurate and unsubstantiated” claims against the company regarding sensitive data sharing with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This would not directly affect customers, at least for now, though it is guaranteed to have a massive effect on DJI’s U.S. presence.

“DJI poses a real national security risk to the U.S. given its deep partnership with the Chinese military, its expressed allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party, and its surveillance technology operating across U.S. soil,” explained Rep John Moolenaar.

The act is not yet in place; it has only made it through one chamber. Supporters have plenty of work to do before it can become a law. Even then, existing DJI drones would not immediately become illegal to operate, and the government has no way of making working UAS into bricks.

Still, putting DJI on the list allows the FCC to revoke authorizations for its drones with no additional acts of Congress… if they wanted to. However, with the significant application of DJI tech in law enforcement and the consumer market, it is unlikely that this change would be made without more compelling evidence against the company.

Before the bill was passed in the House, DJI posted an official blog defending its position in the American market:

“DJI supports the creation of grant programs that empower greater public safety use of drone technologies, but restricting their access to the best products in the market - solely based on protectionist politics and unsubstantiated allegations - will only hinder their operations and damage the drone programs they have built and strengthened over time.”

The bill is sponsored by Elise Stefanik, the U.S. representative for New York's 21st congressional district and fourth-ranking House Republican.

FMI: www.dji.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.05.25: Tesla Flying Car?, Jepp/ForeFlight Sold, A220 Troubles

Also: AFE25 Tickets!, Jamaica Recovery, E-Aircraft at Boeing Fld, Diamond DA50 RG Cert Elon Musk is once again promising the impossible…this time, in the form of a Tesla tha>[...]

Airborne 11.07.25: Affordable Expo Starts!, Duffy Worries, Isaacman!

Also: Louisville UPS Crash Aftermath, Taiwan Boosts Pilot Pool, Spartan Acquires, DON’T MISS the MOSAIC Town Hall! This three-day Affordable Flying Expo brings together indoo>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.05.25)

“Our strategic partnership with AutoFlight, backed by their substantial technological expertise and tangible advancements in eVTOL airworthiness, represents a significant mil>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.05.25)

Aero Linx: British Gliding Association (BGA) The British Gliding Association is the governing body for the sport of gliding in the UK and members are the 76 clubs that provide glid>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

While Descending Toward ASN, He Advanced The Throttle, But The Engine Did Not Respond On October 2, 2025, at 1126 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22, N812SE, was substantially da>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC