NTSB Throws Weight Behind Mandatory CVR Upgrades | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.06.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.08.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.09.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.10.25

Thu, Feb 15, 2024

NTSB Throws Weight Behind Mandatory CVR Upgrades

FAA-Required 2-Hour Limit Inconveniences Investigations, Board Says

The NTSB is pushing to require all cockpit voice recorders to migrate from a 2-hour to a 25-hour capacity, bolstering the ability of crash investigators to retain valuable incident data.

The Board wants the FAA to create a regulatory requirement for 25-hour recorders, citing a number of recent high-profile incidents that were hampered by a technologically outdated 2-hour recording loop. Since 2018, they've identified "at least 14 NTSB investigations have been hampered because cockpit voice recorder, or CVR, data were overwritten, including seven serious runway incursions that occurred in early 2023."

“In the recent Alaska Airlines door plug blowout accident, our investigators don’t have the CVR audio to fully understand all of the challenges the flight crew faced in response to the emergency,” said NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy. “Any investigation in which the CVR audio is overwritten and unavailable to us, means that we may miss opportunities to address safety issues identified on recordings. And that’s unacceptable.”

The NTSB notes that standards abroad already require new-manufacture aircraft to sport a 25-hour CVR, a rule that has been aligned at home. As it stands, that only applies to brand new aircraft, with no provisions for forced retrofitment of improved recording capability. The FAA had once said it would be too expensive for the domestic fleet, but the NTSB said only half as many aircraft would be affected as once thought.

“CVRs are among the most valuable tools for accident investigation because they provide contemporaneous information on flight crew intentions and coordination as well other factors, such as procedural compliance, workload, fatigue, and situational awareness,” said Tim LeBaron, director of the NTSB’s Office of Aviation Safety. “This information is critical to our ability to conduct more thorough investigations and target safety recommendations more effectively.”

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.06.25: FAA Furloughs, Airshows Hit By Shutdown, Livestream Accident

Also: Pilot Age Cap, Skylar AI Flight Assistant, NS-36 Mission, ALPA v Shutdown The federal government has officially gone into lockdown mode. The FAA will be laying off around a f>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.10.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.10.25)

Aero Linx: The Society of United States Air Force Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFFS) Thank you for visiting the Society of United States Air Force Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFFS) web page. We a>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecnam P2006T

Postaccident Examination Of The Airplane Revealed That The Carburetor Heat Levers Remained In The OFF Position Analysis: The flight instructor and commercial pilot receiving multi->[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC