C-172s As 'Hostile' Aircraft... Are You Kidding? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Jun 06, 2003

C-172s As 'Hostile' Aircraft... Are You Kidding?

DoD Needs to Know: Can an F-16 Catch a 172?

AOPA is questioning a Defense Department exercise over the Washington, D.C. area. The nighttime exercise was to have sent two F-16 fighters to intercept two Civil Air Patrol Cessna 172s over the nation's capital to test procedures for "identifying and confronting hostile aircraft," according to defense officials. The exercise, which has to be conducted in VFR conditions, was rescheduled to June 5 (last night) between 10:30 p.m. and midnight EDT.

"We're extraordinarily disappointed that the military essentially told the press that a Cessna 172 is being viewed as a 'threat' aircraft," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "There is no threat analysis we're aware of that suggests that these light general aviation aircraft represent any significant risk to the public. But the publicity surrounding this exercise can only contribute to the unfounded public paranoia concerning GA aircraft."

Just to make it "fair" (more-likely because of noise considerations), Major Don Arias, a spokesman for the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), said the interceptors wouldn't be allowed to use afterburners below a certain altitude. [We do not know if they would be allowed to use them, even in the event of a real threat --ed.]

AOPA also questioned the coordination of the exercise, noting that senior Transportation Security Administration officials knew nothing about it until it was reported in the press.

AOPA has requested that it be allowed to monitor the exercise, but so far the military has not given its approval.

AOPA's Washington, D.C., Legislative Affairs office contacted members of the Senate and House armed services committees. Some of those members of Congress have already raised their questions with the Defense Department.

The association also raised concerns about the safety of the exercise, noting that an intercept is always a risky procedure, particularly when conducted between aircraft having large speed differentials.

"Frankly, if the concern is public safety and security, we wonder why they are conducting this exercise at night over a densely populated area and in one of the busiest air traffic corridors in the nation," said Boyer.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.defenselink.mil

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.11.25)

"The owners envisioned something modern and distinctive, yet deeply meaningful. We collaborated closely to refine the flag design so it complemented the aircraft’s contours w>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.11.25): Nonradar Arrival

Nonradar Arrival An aircraft arriving at an airport without radar service or at an airport served by a radar facility and radar contact has not been established or has been termina>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: David Uhl and the Lofty Art of Aircraft Portraiture

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Still Life with Verve David Uhl was born into a family of engineers and artists—a backdrop conducive to his gleaning a keen appreciation for the >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 12.09.25: Amazon Crash, China Rocket Accident, UAV Black Hawk

Also: Electra Goes Military, Miami Air Taxi, Hypersonics Lab, MagniX HeliStrom Amazon’s Prime Air drones are back in the spotlight after one of its newest MK30 delivery drone>[...]

Airborne 12.05.25: Thunderbird Ejects, Lost Air india 737, Dynon Update

Also: Trailblazing Aviator Betty Stewart, Wind Farm Scrutiny, Chatham Ban Overturned, Airbus Shares Dive A Thunderbird pilot, ID'ed alternately as Thunderbird 5 or Thunderbird 6, (>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC