Report: Flying Doesn't Cause Cancer | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Jul 18, 2003

Report: Flying Doesn't Cause Cancer

Pilots Bring it On Themselves, Researcher Says

Contrary to results of some of the smaller studies that have been run in recent years, New Scientist magazine reported this week that a European study of frequent fliers did not indicate any greater risk of cancer than the general population.

The study enlisted 44,000 airline employees, from eight countries. The only group with a higher incidence of cancer than the general population were the front-seaters; but one of the researchers said that was a lifestyle thing: "Pilots go on vacation more often than other people and they get free flights. There's anecdotal evidence that they're in the sun more than other people," said Maria Blettner, of the University of Bielefeld in Germany.

Ms. Blettner did not mention that pilots sit in the sunlight much of the time, while cabin crew (and PAX) are in the shadow of the big tube, aft. The concerns that bothered researchers most, though, revolved around with cosmic rays, which are not blocked by the aircraft's body -- but which are dissipated to a great degree by atmosphere. Since there's a lot more atmosphere on the ground than at 35,000 feet, some reasoned, cosmic ray exposure should be less-damaging at lower altitudes. That's assuming that cosmic rays do cause cancer.

The New Scientist also noted, "Indeed, a separate study of 28,000 pilots, to be published by the same team in the International Journal of Cancer, found there were one third fewer deaths from cancer in pilots." Riddle me that...

FMI: article

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC