House Panel Votes To Keep F-22 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Jun 19, 2009

House Panel Votes To Keep F-22

Close Vote In House Armed Services Committee

By a 31-30 vote, the House Armed Services Committee agreed to keep funding for the embattled F-22 Raptor program, despite objections from the White House. While the Democratic chairs of both the HASC and the Air and Land Forces Subcommittee voted against the measure, Republicans managed to peel off enough Democrats to gain the narrow margin. House aides have said the bill will face a difficult time in the full House, and the Senate.

The amendment with funding for the F-22, authored by Utah Republican Bob Bishop, is attached to a more comprehensive spending bill. It would pay for the planes with money shifted from environmental cleanup at some military bases.

According to The New York Times, the bill appropriates $369 million for part for 12 new fighters. The vote comes at a time when some allies, most notably Japan, are expressing an interest in buying F-22's from the U.S., though current law prohibits their export. The Japanese government might have to pay up to $2 billion for the removal of certain stealth technologies from the planes they would buy. Japan has expressed in interest in up to 40 aircraft.

Republicans have been opposed the Obama administrations plan to halt production of the F-22 after building 187 of the planes, which cost about $200 million each. GOP leaders say the additional fighters are needed to insure against potential threats from major powers.

Opponents of the plane, however, point to the fact that it has not been used in either Iraq or Afghanistan, and say that it is an unaffordable cold war relic.

FMI: http://armedservices.house.gov/ 

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC