NTSB Final Report: Piper Aircraft Inc PA-44-180 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Columbus day Holiday

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.24

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.10.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.18.24

Tue, Dec 19, 2023

NTSB Final Report: Piper Aircraft Inc PA-44-180

The Flight Instructor Did Not Remember That The Landing Gear Was Still Retracted

Location: Bonham, Texas Accident Number: CEN23LA382
Date & Time: August 23, 2023, 15:40 Local Registration: N7122E
Aircraft: Piper Aircraft Inc PA-44-180 Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Landing gear not configured Injuries: 2 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Instructional

Analysis: The flight instructor stated that during a simulated one engine inoperative approach and landing, the pilot receiving instruction chose to leave the landing gear retracted until the landing was assured. The pilot receiving instruction turned the airplane onto a short base leg before final, increased the mixture and propeller control settings, and increased the airplane bank angle so as not to overshoot the final approach course. The flight  instructor saw that the airplane airspeed was decreasing and told the pilot receiving instruction that they were low. 

The pilot receiving instruction increased airplane pitch, which resulted in a decrease in airspeed, a loss of altitude, and a rolling motion. The flight instructor leveled the wings and reduced pitch to regain airplane control and lift. When the airplane was over the runway threshold, the flight instructor did not remember that the landing gear was still retracted and he did not complete the final landing checklist, which resulted in a landing with the landing gear retracted. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the underside fuselage longerons. 

There was no mechanical malfunction/failure of the airplane or system that would have precluded normal operations.

Probable Cause and Findings: The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be -- The failure of the pilot receiving instruction and flight instructor to follow the landing checklist and extend the landing gear before landing.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Textron Proposes New Contract to Striking Machinists

Presented Just Three Weeks After its “Best and Final” Offer Three weeks ago, Textron Aviation presented its “best and final” offer to its striking machinist>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

After The Airplane Exited The Left Side Of The Runway It Continued Into A Tree... On September 25, 2024, at 1833 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22 airplane, N565CP, was substant>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.18.24)

“Our focus this decade is to win the NASA Commercial LEO Destination (CLD) contract and build the successor to the International Space Station. To achieve this, we will first>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.18.24): Air Carrier District Office

Air Carrier District Office An FAA field office serving an assigned geographical area, staffed with Flight Standards personnel serving the aviation industry and the general public >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.18.24)

Aero Linx: The Vertical Flight Society (VFS) The Vertical Flight Society, formerly the American Helicopter Society (AHS), is the non-profit technical society for the advancement of>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC