New Florida Law Curtails Use of Chinese-Made Drones | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Apr 12, 2023

New Florida Law Curtails Use of Chinese-Made Drones

The Pursuit of Privacy

A bill perspicaciously drafted by Florida lawmakers in 2020 and passed in 2021 went into effect on Monday, 10 April 2023.

Subject law bans Sunshine State government agencies from utilizing drones made by a “foreign country of concern,” which is to tacitly state China and strongly imply DJI—a company accused of collaborating with the Chinese Communist Party and added, in December 2021, to a US Treasury Department blacklist. The Chinese communist party is a direct and major investor in DJI and maintains considerable control over the company’s operations.

Drone industry publications—many of which are heavily dependent upon DJI advertising and endorsement—have intimated Florida police agencies are unhappy with the new law’s implementation, penning sweeping statements the likes of “… police agencies are not happy about it,” and “ … [police departments] are upset they have to use inferior and potentially dangerous replacements.”

Such allegations are belied by Florida residents’ positive reception of the new law and the fact that police departments throughout the state are willingly grounding their entire fleets of Chinese-made drones.

Florida Senate Bill 44, now section 934.50 of Florida’s statutes, put in place standards and rules pertaining to the use of drones by the state’s government agencies, law enforcement, fire departments, and others public entities. Many statutes contained in the legislation were previously in place and range from the codification of systems by which to publicly disseminate images or videos captured by drones to the proper storage of drones. The bill’s final provisions went into effect on 10 April and specify those drone models alternately approved and prohibited by Florida’s state legislature.

Per the newly enacted law, Florida governmental and public agencies may operate drones built by:

  • Skydio
  • Parrot
  • Altavian
  • Teal Drones
  • Vantage Robotics

Teal Drones and Vantage Robotics are U.S. companies with foci in the defense and public safety sectors. Altavian, has been purchased by FLIR and no longer operates under its former moniker.

Speaking to the subject of the new Florida law, a DJI spokesperson set forth:

"Today’s Florida ruling against the use of Chinese-made drones for law enforcement is a regrettable development and is unjustified.

"A vast number of government agencies and commercial entities in the U.S. rely on and use DJI drones in their daily work. This includes law enforcement, first responders, infrastructure inspectors, and others who know they can trust our products because they are safe and secure.

"They trust us because independent audits to stress-test our cybersecurity and privacy practices demonstrate not only our products’ strength but also identify potential vulnerabilities. These independent audits include the U.S. Department of Commerce in 2022, FTI Consulting in 2020, Booz Allen Hamilton in 2020, the Idaho National Laboratory (for the US Department of Homeland Security) in 2019, the U.S. Department of Interior in 2019, and Kivu Consulting in 2018. The findings are consistent: Our cybersecurity/privacy practices are sound.

"Any position based solely on country of origin limits competition, innovation, and possibly, endangers lives. DJI drones allow first responders to safely engage in life-threatening scenarios, inspect infrastructure otherwise not visible, and have been used to rescue hundreds of people in peril around the world. A rash, uninformed decision that limits access to our technology because of concerns about country of origin will literally cost lives."

FMI: www.myflorida.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.10.25)

“As the excitement builds for the world of flight returning to Oshkosh in 2026, we wanted to ensure that advance tickets are available for those who enjoy giving AirVenture t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.10.25): North Atlantic High Level Airspace (NAT HLA)

North Atlantic High Level Airspace (NAT HLA) That volume of airspace (as defined in ICAO Document 7030) between FL 285 and FL 420 within the Oceanic Control Areas of Bodo Oceanic, >[...]

Airborne 12.08.25: Samaritan’s Purse Hijack, FAA Med Relief, China Rocket Fail

Also: Cosmonaut Kicked Out, Airbus Scales Back, AF Silver Star, Russian A-60 Clobbered A Samaritan’s Purse humanitarian flight was hijacked on Tuesday, December 2, while atte>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC