Capt. Michael Scott Speicher: Now, 'Missing/Captured' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Tue, Oct 15, 2002

Capt. Michael Scott Speicher: Now, 'Missing/Captured'

Once Thought MIA, Then KIA, Then MIA; Now 'Captured'

As things progress to another war against Iraq, there's another reason to go to Baghdad: to find a Naval aviator who was written off on January 17, 1991 (the first night of the Gulf War) as Missing in Action.

In 1995, the Red Cross and military investigators examined the wreckage of his F/A-18 Hornet, and had his status changed to  "Killed in Action/Body Not Recovered," as they closed the book. As the Navy had more time to investigate in the late 1990s, it did; and, in January of 2001, as the Administrations turned over, so did Captain Speicher's status: he again became classed as, Missing in Action.

On Friday, Navy Secretary Gordon England elevated Speicher's family's hopes, changing the missing airman's status to the current, Missing/Captured. It is not known what new evidence the Navy has, if any; England told reporters that the status change was "the logical extension" in the saga. No specific information was released, to back up the change; but it may be important,as war preparations are made, to make the change, for political or morale reasons. England wrote, in relation to the status upgrade, "While the information available to me now does not prove definitively that Captain Speicher is alive and in Iraqi custody, I am personally convinced that the Iraqis seized him sometime after his plane went down. It is my firm belief that the government of Iraq knows what happened to Captain Speicher."

Again, no information was given for that belief; nor was there any discussion of in what way "information available to me now" differed from "information available to me five years ago." Information, available at some time (but not necessarily "new") includes the facts:

  • Speicher ejected. It's likely he survived the ejection; it's also like he was injured.
  • The flight suit provided the investigators may well have been Speicher's; it indicates it was not in the airplane when it crashed.
  • England also cited unspecified "cumulative information," in his upgrade decision.

Well, I'm convinced.

FMI: www.state.gov, www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC