McCain Wants Answers on 767 Deal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 23, 2003

McCain Wants Answers on 767 Deal

After a flurry of press releases and a lot of Capitol Hill arm-twisting by the Air Force (and presumably Boeing lobbyists) all Summer, and a flurry of GAO reports that question the methodology of the scheme, the Air Force on Friday made a heavy appeal to Congress to get the KC-767A (767-based tanker) deal approved.

Senator John McCain, who has been skeptical of the leasing plan -- or even the need for fleet replacement -- from the start, now wants Joshua Bolten, Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, to submit, in writing, the reasons why the proposed deal doesn't square with the OMB's guidelines -- or why it shouldn't have to.

The controversy runs on two levels: until Boeing's financials looked so really lousy (in the post-September 11 era), the Air Force didn't have any urgent complaints about its old, but little-used tanker fleet. In report after request, the Air Force's "need for new tankers" wasn't up there on the list of "things we really need." That changed recently; and -- surprise -- Boeing (the logical choice, at any rate) just happened to have a 767-based tanker design... almost ready to go.

The other level has to do with how the Air Force wants to pay for the new birds, and how much of our money they're going to use, to do just that. The price looks steep to many; and beyond that, there's a really sweet leasing deal, that's even more expensive (and more-expensive yet, the more information gets out). Though there is a "price-protection" clause worked in, it's effective only if Boeing sells similar aircraft to somebody else, for a lower price. Just who would be bidding, and who would be allowed to take delivery -- is a matter for not much conjecture.

At any rate, the OMB has until Tuesday to spin this deal into something that at least looks legit. McCain's Senate Armed Services Committee is the last of four legislative panels that needs to approve the deal; and, assuming the spin can't cover the "interesting" aspects of the deal, McCain's doggedness may yet save the taxpayers a few dozen million dollars.

FMI: www.af.mil; www.boeing.com; http://mccain.senate.gov/

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Pure Aerial Precision - The Snowbirds at AirVenture 2016

From 2016 (YouTube Edition): The Canadian Forces Snowbirds Can Best Be Described As ‘Elegant’… EAA AirVenture 2016 was a great show and, in no small part, it was>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2012 Traveller

Airplane Lunged Forward When It Was Stuck From Behind By A Tug That Was Towing An Unoccupied Airliner Analysis: At the conclusion of the air taxi flight, the flight crew were taxii>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.23.25)

Aero Linx: International Stinson Club So you want to buy a Stinson. Well the Stinson is a GREAT value aircraft. The goal of the International Stinson Club is to preserve informatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.23.25): Request Full Route Clearance

Request Full Route Clearance Used by pilots to request that the entire route of flight be read verbatim in an ATC clearance. Such request should be made to preclude receiving an AT>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.23.25)

"Today's battlefield is adapting rapidly. By teaching our soldiers to understand how drones work and are built, we are giving them the skills to think creatively and apply emerging>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC