Boeing Doubts USAF Will Seek New Bids For CSAR-X | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Thu, Mar 15, 2007

Boeing Doubts USAF Will Seek New Bids For CSAR-X

May Reevaluate Operating Costs Instead

Despite strong recommendations from the Government Accounting Office to the contrary, representatives at Boeing say they doubt the US Air Force will reopen competition for the $15 billion CSAR-X contract award for a new search-and-rescue helicopter.

As Aero-News reported, last month the GAO ruled on protests by Lockheed Martin and Sikorsky, and recommended the USAF reopen bidding on the CSAR-X contract awarded to Boeing in November 2006. Last week, Air Force officials replied, essentially, the USAF doesn't have to comply with the GAO suggested -- as the agency's ruling is nonbinding, and carries little real legislative weight.

Though of course Boeing doesn't want to see its contract slip away, this week the American aerospace manufacturer took something of a middle-of-the-road position on the matter, opining to Bloomberg the Air Force will probably opt to review operating and support costs figures for the three entrants in the competition.

Rick Lemaster, Boeing program manager for its winning CSAR-X entry, the HH-47, said that was the main point of the GAO's recommendations, anyway.

"We expect the Air Force will address the specific issue identified by GAO and not permit other bidders to set an agenda for an entirely new competition that might be in their interests but not in the best interests of the service," Lemaster said.  "Enhancing the Air Force's ability to save the lives of our soldiers and airmen sooner rather than later should be the most important consideration."

Lockheed had offered its US101(center), jointly produced by Bell and a variant of the helo named as the new Marine One presidential transport in 2005. Sikorsky pitched its S-92-based HH-92 (bottom) in the competition to replace the Air Force's existing fleet of Sikorsky-built HH-60 Pave Hawks.

FMI: www.af.mil, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC