NZ UAV Operator Fined $3,000 For A ‘Favor’ | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Sep 02, 2015

NZ UAV Operator Fined $3,000 For A ‘Favor’

Had Captured Video Of New Zealand’s Anzac Day Celebration At The Request Of The City Council

UAV operator Robert Edwards got caught up in a regulatory change that resulted in $3,000 in fines levied by the New Zealand government for flying his aircraft over the Anzac Day centenary commemoration in Palmerston North in New Zealand.

Edwards had been contracted to take some photos using his UAV by the city council of the celebration. But a change in the rules that went into effect August 1 requires UAV operators to get the permission of a landowner and the air traffic control unit overseeing the airspace of an intended flight. Palmerston North is under the jurisdiction of the Palmerston North Airport tower.

sUAS News relays a report from stuff.co.nz that there was a complaint to the New Zealand CAA, and he was hit with fines of $2,000 for operating a “model aircraft” in controlled airspace without permission, and $1,000 for operating his aircraft “at night,”

“Yes, OK, I broke the rules. I didn’t mean to,” Edwards said.

The City Council distanced itself from Edwards. Council chief executive Paddy Clifford said Edwards had been contracted to take the photos, but “it is our understanding that Mr.Edwards, ad the pilot and operator, was responsible for complying with the CAA guidelines and rules covering the use of the drone.”

Edwards had reportedly asked for some support from the council to help with his case with the CAA. A spokeswoman for the agency said that the fines are fixed, and there is no flexibility in what is imposed.

Edwards said the fines were “excessive.” Since being fined, Edwards said he’s done “four or five jobs … I have done everything right.”

(Image from file)

FMI:  www.caa.govt.nz/rpas/

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Cozy Cub

Witness Reported The Airplane Was Flying Low And Was In A Left Bank When It Struck The Power Line Analysis: The pilot was on final approach to land when the airplane collided with >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Seated On The Edge Of Forever -- A PPC's Bird's Eye View

From 2012 (YouTube Edition): A Segment Of The Sport Aviation World That Truly Lives "Low And Slow" Pity the life of ANN's Chief videographer, Nathan Cremisino... shoot the most exc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.25)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council (IBAC) IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of its industry and in all regions of the world. As >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.25): Execute Missed Approach

Execute Missed Approach Instructions issued to a pilot making an instrument approach which means continue inbound to the missed approach point and execute the missed approach proce>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC