Tue, Nov 02, 2010
Australian Proposal Similar To One Under Consideration By The
U.S. Congress
Australia-based Regional Express
(Rex) is concerned over recent suggestions requiring all pilots
engaged in airline operations in Australia to have a minimum of
1500 hours flying time as suggested in a current
Australian Senate inquiry into pilot training.
The move follows a similar proposal in the United States, which
the Australian regional airline calls a "knee jerk reaction" to a
fatal airline accident. It points out that that accident involved
two experienced pilots with well over 2000 hours of flight
experience each.
Like many major airlines around the world, Rex runs a
cadet program specifically designed to produce high quality pilots.
Results from comprehensive simulator and aircraft proficiency tests
have conclusively proven that cadets in their first year of flying
demonstrate equal skills in all aspects tested. In their second
year of flying their performance surpasses the more experienced
direct intake pilots with over 1500 hours at point of entry.
“There is absolutely no
scientific basis that a pilot with less than 1500 hours would be
unsafe," said Rex Managing Director Jim Davis. "If that were the
case, the RAAF would not be entrusting our sophisticated fighter
jets to pilots with less than 500 hours of flight experience. In
fact European and Australian authorities have officially approved
training programs that allow pilots to fly large jet aircraft with
less than 100 hours of direct flight experience."
"A minimum requirement of 1500 hours for airline pilots would be
an absolute disaster," he continued. "It would mean the end of all
pilot cadet programs in Australia and make it impossible for
airlines to source enough pilots to cope with planned future
expansion. This would have a disastrous effect amongst small and
regional operators as their pilot ranks would get plundered by the
larger airlines as we saw in FY08, when Rex lost half its pilots to
the major airlines in one year. To stay in operation, the smaller
operators would have no choice but to accept pilots from General
Aviation with sufficient minimum hours but who may not have the
desired skill level to be an airline pilot. This would lead to the
opposite effect intended by the proposal. What the Senate Inquiry
needs to focus on is the quality of training a pilot receives not
the quantity of hours a pilot has flown."
Rex has made a submission to the Senate inquiry which is
available for public viewing and also on its website.
More News
Don't Miss Our Comprehensive Annual Coverage Of Aviation's 'Spring Break' Here it comes! ANN has prepared its most comprehensive coverage EVER of the SUN n FUN Aerospace Expo... an>[...]
NOT So Sure Elon Would Agrre With You, Klyde... FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]
“We value our long-standing partnership with Japan Airlines and are honored by their decision to double down on the 737 MAX for the airline’s fleet modernization progra>[...]
From 2018 (YouTube Edition): Clarity Aloft Introduces The TSO Certified Flex Headset The newest addition to the Clarity Aloft headset range is a big departure from previous designs>[...]
Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]