No Surprise Here: Airlines Object To LaGuardia Limits | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Jan 07, 2007

No Surprise Here: Airlines Object To LaGuardia Limits

Minimum Seat-Count Rule Finding Few Friends

The FAA is making no friends with its plans to reorganize what can politely be called "congested" LaGuardia Airport.

The most recent objection to the FAA's proposal to reallocate flights based on past gate usage came from the Air Transport Association in a formal objection filed Wednesday. The trade group includes American, Continental, Delta, United, and other established carriers.

The agency is seeking to ensure that LaGuardia's limited gate space is used to its full potential; airlines flying smaller jets risk losing flight slots to airlines willing to fly wider-bodied jets carrying more passengers, said NewYorkBusiness.com. The agency is seeking to require an average plane size of 105 - 122 seats for all LaGuardia gates; many of the major airlines' flights use small jets.

"The proposed rule represents governmental micromanagement and interference... not seen since the airline industry was deregulated in 1978," said the Air Transport Association.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has also chimed in on the plan, objecting strongly to what it perceives as FAA interference in airport ground operations. The Port Authority has proposed its own airport reforms that include requiring airlines to use their gates at 80 percent capacity for the year.

Not everyone is unhappy with the FAA proposal, however. Low cost carriers, such as Southwest and JetBlue, would gain from implementation of the FAA proposal; JetBlue Chief Executive David Neeleman has openly expressed his support of most aspects of the FAA plan.

The FAA proposal to establish new flight rules came following last summer's recovery in air travel that brought LaGuardia's traffic closer to peak levels not seen since the summer of 2000. At that time, the airport accounted for 25 percent of all flight delays nationwide. The FAA released its initial plan in August and interested parties had until year-end to file public comments.

FMI: www.panynj.gov/CommutingTravel/airports/html/laguardia.html, www.airlines.org, www.jetblue.org

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC