747 Tail Dragger? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Mar 14, 2003

747 Tail Dragger?

Wednesday's 'Mystery' Partially Solved

Rotation was a bit exaggerated Wednesday, as a Singapore Airlines 747-400 took off for a very short flight. For a while, though, no one knew just what caused a significant amount of damage to that big machine.

Some of the 368 passengers, and probably some of the 20 crew, told reporters noticed the plane used nearly all the runway, and kept its nose up for an unusually long time, as it struggled to leave the ground. Then it flew around Auckland, dumping fuel [that's what one report said -- another noted that, since there was a fire annunciator lit, the crew merely performed an overweight landing --ed], for another few minutes, and came back. That sortie took long enough that the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) heard none of the takeoff -- the tape loops every 1/2 hour, and the flight lasted just a few minutes too long.

People on the ground were horrified -- some said the plane looked like a flying, flaming wreck.
People in the aircraft were catching on, too -- the flight had gone nowhere, and here they were, coming back into Auckland, with a huge greeting party of safety vehicles, fire trucks, and ambulances all lined up. "Is that for us?" was probably heard more than once, in the cabin. We don't want to know what the reply might have been...

At any rate, crews on the ground got some video; nobody was seriously hurt; fifty or so flights, including four international flights, were delayed or sent elsewhere as the runway got swept up -- and a replacement plane was flown in, to pick up the hardy PAX.

The plane itself was nine years old, and had undergone heavy maintenance last month. The Transport Accident Commission promises a full investigation. Repairs are expected to take weeks, as the plane sits contentedly at Auckland.

FMI: www.singaporeair.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.16.25): NonApproach Control Tower

NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.16.25)

“This shutdown inflicted real damage. Beyond disrupting operations and adding risk into the aviation system… it hindered essential career growth opportunities and stal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.16.25)

Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12

Pilot’s Improper Installation Of The Control Stick Pushrod Assemblies, Which Resulted In Separation Of The Left Pushrod And A Total Loss Of Roll Control Analysis: While retur>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC