Authorities Say Gatwick Drone 'Chaos' May Have Been An 'Inside Job' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Apr 17, 2019

Authorities Say Gatwick Drone 'Chaos' May Have Been An 'Inside Job'

Say That Drone Operator Seemed To Know About The 'Airport Operating Environment'

Authorities believe that an airport "insider" may have been responsible for the drone incidents which closed Gatwick Airport in December of last year. The incidents affected some 140,000 passengers during the three-day closure.

Gatwick Chief Operating Officer Chris Woodroofe told the BBC "Panorama" program that whoever was operating the drone appeared to have knowledge of the airport operational procedures, and "seemed to be able to see what was happening on the runway ... It was clear that the drone operators had a link into what was going on at the airport."

The interview was the first given by Woodroofe since the incident occurred. Sussex Police said on the same program that the possibility of an "insider" being involved is "credible".

Woodroofe also said that the drone operator "specifically" chose an aircraft that was invisible to the DJI Aeroscope detection system that was being tested at the time.

The first drone sighting occurred at 2103 GMT on December 19. Gatwick tried on several occasions to reopen the airport and each time, the unmanned aircraft reappeared. Airport rules require the runway to be closed if a drone is sighted. The sightings finally stopped on December 21 at 0557 GMT.

The search for the perpetrator has consumed resources from multiple agencies, and there is a reward of about $65,000 for information about the culprit. But so far, the investigation has turned up no trace of person or persons responsible.

(Image from file)

FMI: Source report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC