Rep. Oberstar Sides With NATCA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Thu, Sep 25, 2003

Rep. Oberstar Sides With NATCA

Says Controllers Conceal Mistakes

Representative James Oberstar (D-8-MN) has released the following endorsement of the controllers' union position:

Dear Aviation Subcommittee Colleague:

At tomorrow's [Wednesday's] hearing on contracting out of FAA's air traffic control facilities, the Subcommittee will consider a recent report of DOT's Inspector General (IG), which evaluates data on the safety of existing contract towers compared to towers operated by FAA controllers. I have been doubtful that the data discussed by the IG provides a basis for comparing the safety of the two types of towers.

A major concern is that the only data evaluated by the IG was "operational errors;" that is, instances which controllers permit aircraft to get closer than established standards for aircraft separation. The only way that this data becomes available is for the controller who makes the error to report it. There is no basis for determining whether contract towers or FAA towers report all the errors, or whether one type of tower may be more inclined to under-report than the other type. This raises serious questions as to the usefulness of the data for making comparisons.

Because of my concerns, I asked the General Accounting Office for its opinion on whether comparisons of operational errors among different types of air traffic control facilities can be used to compare their safety. In the attached report, GAO concluded that:

"We identified several potential limitations with FAA's data on operations errors based on our review of issued GAO and DOT reports and applications of best methodological practices."

"Comparisons of operational errors among types of air traffic control facilities, such as FAA-staffed facilities versus contractor-staffed facilities, cannot be used alone to provide valid conclusions about safety. based on standard methodological practices and our understanding of FAA's data."

"The determination of real differences in the rate of operational errors between different types of air traffic control facilities is difficult, and comparisons of operational error rates alone are not sufficient to draw conclusions about the relative safety records of air traffic facilities."

I strongly urge you and your staff to review this GAO report in preparation for tomorrow's hearing.

Sincerely,

James L. Oberstar (above, with TSA boss James Loy, at AOPA forum)
Ranking Democratic Member, COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Sens Lautenberg and Daschle Flip-Flop on 'Privatization' Issue
Then, It Wasn't 'Safety' or 'Politics,' You See; It Was Just a Good Idea

Jeff Gannon, of Talon News, noted that, "[Senator Frank] Lautenberg (D-NJ) was quoted in the Washington Post in 1994, saying, 'The [Clinton] administration's proposal to privatize the air traffic control system is consistent with the desire to bring more efficiency and reform to government and should be reviewed seriously.'" Gannon dug up a 1993 Capitol speech by that same senator: "I strongly endorse the FAA's contract tower program for level 1 (the smallest) control towers. ... The use of contract towers is an example of how we can reduce the costs of Government services and achieve savings over the long run."

You see, in those days, when Lautenberg was endorsing privatization, the idea was part of then-VP Al Gore's 'Reinventing Government' program. Gore's a Democrat; Lautenberg's a Democrat...

Sen. Daschle (D-SD), then the Senate Majority Leader, was full of kudos for Lautenberg at the time: "I would like to compliment the Senator from New Jersey for once again doing a masterful job in providing the Senate with an appropriations bill that recognizes the importance of our transportation systems to the health of our economy and fairly balances the competing demands for improved transportation services throughout the United States."

Gannon correctly points out that now-mega-lobbyist Linda Hall Daschle, the senator's wife, was a Deputy Administrator of the FAA at the time. Now, both senators are threatening to nuke FAA funding if the union's wishes [against privatization] aren't included.

Administrator Blakey pointed out at the hearing Wednesday that 99% of the controllers are former FAA or former military, anyway.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.10.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna 172

The Airplane Came To Rest Underneath A Set Of Damaged Power Distribution Lines On The Floor Of A Coulee On June 19, 2025, at 1412 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 172K airplane, N7>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.10.25)

Aero Linx: FAA Managers Association (FAAMA) Recognized by the FAA, FAAMA is a professional association dedicated to the promotion of excellence in public service. The Association i>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Big Business of Diminutive Powerplants

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Jet Central Micro-Turbine Engines Impress Founded in the late-1990s, Mexico City-based Jet Central produces a unique and fascinating line of micro-turb>[...]

Airborne 07.11.25: New FAA Bos, New NASA Boss (Kinda), WB57s Over TX

Also: ANOTHER Illegal Drone, KidVenture Educational Activities, Record Launches, TSA v Shoes The Senate confirmed Bryan Bedford to become the next Administrator of the FAA, in a ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC