Osprey Damaged In Thunderstorm -- To The Tune Of $1 Million | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Nov 09, 2005

Osprey Damaged In Thunderstorm -- To The Tune Of $1 Million

Tiltrotor Landed Safely After Incident

Military officials are now investigating an Air Force-spec Bell V-22 Osprey tiltrotor after it suffered extensive damage to its engines after ingesting ice in flight during a thunderstorm last month.

The damage -- which did not cause the engines to stall, allowing the crew to make an precautionary landing near Prescott, AZ -- may require repairs costing as much as $1 million to return the bird to flight, according to media reports. The incident occurred as a Defense Contract Management agency team was delivering the test aircraft (not a production model) from Bell's facility in Amarillo, TX to Edwards AFB, CA.

"There is a mishap investigation ongoing," said James Darcy, spokesman for the V-22 Joint Program Office.

What may be most important, though, is not how much this incident will cost to repair -- but instead, the fact the V-22 incurred such damage but still managed to bring its crew safely down to the ground. The safety record Osprey has been especially scrutinized since 23 Marines died in a pair of V-22 accidents during flight tests in 2000.

Over the next five years, several Osprey systems were redesigned -- and flight training programs were revised -- in response to the accidents. The final production version of the aircraft was approved by the Pentagon last September.

FMI: www.bellhelicopter.com/en/aircraft/military/bellV-22.cfm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.16.25): NonApproach Control Tower

NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.16.25)

“This shutdown inflicted real damage. Beyond disrupting operations and adding risk into the aviation system… it hindered essential career growth opportunities and stal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.16.25)

Aero Linx: The Mooney Mite Site Dedicated to the Mooney M-18 Mite, "The Most Personal Airplane," and to supporting Mite owners everywhere. The Mooney M-18 Mite is a single-place, l>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Vans Aircraft Inc RV-12

Pilot’s Improper Installation Of The Control Stick Pushrod Assemblies, Which Resulted In Separation Of The Left Pushrod And A Total Loss Of Roll Control Analysis: While retur>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC