Journalist Speculates That Airbus Airplanes May Have A Control Flaw | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, May 03, 2012

Journalist Speculates That Airbus Airplanes May Have A Control Flaw

Says Side Stick Design May Have Contributed To AF447 Accident

With the final report on the Air France Flight 447 accident due out in June, a report appearing in the U.K. newspaper The Daily Telegraph theorizes that the cockpit design common to all Airbus aircraft may have contributed to the confusion in the cockpit prior to the plane impacting the water.

Airbus airplanes have two side stick controls which are not linked. Therefore, the pilot not flying the airplane, or anyone else in the cockpit, is unable to easily see or feel what control inputs are being made by the pilot flying the airplane. After conducting interviews with several accident investigators, the paper says that had another pilot been aware that the pilot flying the airplane was pulling it into a nose-up attitude, he might have been able to correct the aerodynamic stall before the plane hit the water.

Transcripts from the cockpit voice recorder recovered about two years after the accident do indicate that there was some confusion about what needed to be done among the three pilots to prevent the accident. The French aviation safety agency BEA is expected to place most of the emphasis for the accident on pilot error, with only a mention of the side stick design.

Airbus would not comment to the paper for the article. In an appearance on Fox News, the journalist, Nick Ross, said it was not his intention to suggest that the A330 or any Airbus airplane was unsafe. "All commercial airliners are remarkably safe," he said. But his contention is that the design could be made safer. (A330 flight deck image courtesy Airbus)

FMI: www.bea.aero/en/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC