But Not Because It's a Stupid Sop to Airport-Haters and
Developers
There's good news, and there's bad news.
First, the good news:
the airport-destroying facilitation of the NIMBYs who are so intent
on turning over the Boca Raton (FL) airport to developers is being
stopped. The airport was paying a reported grand a month to rent
software to track complaints, and foster their sharing on its
website.
Now, the bad news: there is going to be a new system installed
to take its place. And you're paying for it.
The really bad news is, the old system wasn't pulled because it
was a dumb idea; it was pulled because a rival software company
threatened a patent infringement lawsuit.
The new system, though, may not be such a bad thing. Instead of
relying on the agitated NIMBYs' own guesses as to how much noise
the targeted airplanes are making, the new system, to be purchased
by the airport with FAA money, will measure actual noise
levels.
$645,000 of the the FAA's $1.14 million grant will be used to
keep track of noise
The old system didn't do that nearly so well; it registered
complaints, which may have been of a subjective nature.
We put in a call in to the FAA, to see how such a large approval
of grant monies could have become available so very fast.
Christopher White, in the FAA's Atlanta office, told us that,
"$645,000 is allocated for a noise monitoring system... It is no
different [in its timing] from any other grant."
He added, "They started
a Part 150 noise study in 1999, with a $200,000 grant." The ongoing
study covers both noise exposure maps and noise-compatibility
program -- how the airport will implement a noise program, once
data are gathered. Noise exposure maps -- computer simulations --
show where aircraft noise is loudest. It's not based on data --
it's a model. Specific-type aircraft that operate from Boca are
modeled.
Mr. White continued, "They'll get six fixed monitors, and one
portable. Alterations can be made to the [computer modeling]
program, based on these results." He did not know where the
equipment would come from. "FAA does not have an approved vendor
list; it is up to the airport to buy the equipment."
The money showed up in a week, but that's 'not atypical.'
"Boca mentioned its need for the equipment,
informally, in March of 2002, and made a formal request on
August 15 of this year," he told us, "and the FAA executed the
grant on August 22."
One week?
"That date was based on when funds were released. We do not view
this as atypical," White noted; then he added, lest we get spoiled
by the FAA's quick response time, "It's also not atypical for this
to take a number of months -- it depends on the availability of
funds to us."
Noise is monitored
constantly, and a "weighted average" is used, to determine probable
NIMBY irritation levels. "Weighted" means that it's not the
real average -- night noises are given more "weight" than day
noises. The actual weighting (as well as who would do the
weighting, and what revisions in weighting would be made, if the
results didn't come out "right") wasn't known at press
time.
Wouldn't the readings in the winter (when the ground is dry and
hard and realtively barren) be different from those taken in
midsummer (when the ground is wet and soft, and the foliage is
full)? Probably, but it doesn't matter, for the purposes of
the study. It's not the noise from the airplane that
matters, really; it's the result of that noise on the
ground. So, if the noise is louder during one season vs
another, well, it's louder -- what the airplane puts out isn't
nearly so important as the noise level that lands on
the guy who's trying to enjoy his barbeque.
If the noise monitors don't show that the people below are being
rational in their complaints, it's still quite possible that the
airport will decide to buy their land, or pay to soundproof their
houses. That may be cheaper than fighting the expected frivolous,
groundless lawsuits.
[There is one other possibility: perhaps the airplanes are
really illegally loud. We may find out, depending on how
non-political that "weighting" system is --ed.]