Boeing Funds, Conducts Study On Effect Of Cabin Pressure On Passenger Discomfort | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Jul 06, 2007

Boeing Funds, Conducts Study On Effect Of Cabin Pressure On Passenger Discomfort

Study Published On Eve Of Dreamliner Rollout

Timing, as the say, is everything. Boeing funded and conducted a study of the relationshiop between cabin pressurization in airliners, to passenger discomfort. The results of that study appear in the July 5 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine... three days before the public rollout of Boeing's own 787 Dreamliner, which -- coincidentally -- will feature a cabin pressurized to a lower altitude.

Most aircraft cabins are pressurized to 8,000 feet, which lowers blood oxygen saturation by about four percentage points. The study says pressurizing a cabin to 6,000 feet would help some passengers feel better while flying, according to Health Day News.

"We found that the altitudes did not affect the occurrence of acute mountain sickness syndrome, but it did affect discomfort," said Dr. J. Michael Muhm, the study's lead author. He is also the senior occupation physician for Boeing Commercial Airplanes in Seattle, which funded the study.

Acute Mountain sickness (AMS) is a high altitude illness that causes such symptoms as headache, insomnia, nausea, anorexia and dizziness. A high altitude headache, (HAH) is the most prominent symptom of AMS, according to the Brady Critical Care Paramedic textbook.

"There was no difference in the likelihood of discomfort at ground level and 6,000 feet, but the likelihood increased between 6,000 and 8,000 feet," Muhm said. "We concluded that passenger and crew comfort would be enhanced if the cabin was pressurized to 6,000 feet during long-duration flights."

One of the things the study's authors wanted to find out is if air travelers were prone to AMS, or other high altitude maladies.

"The average Joe in good condition could tolerate 8,000 feet without health effects," said Dr. Claude Thibeault, medical director of the International Air Transport Association in Montreal. But, "They didn't say without discomfort."

The study had 502 adult volunteers take part in a 20-hour simulated flight. It measured the effects of barometric pressures on arterial oxygen saturation of altitudes at 650, 4,000, 6,000, 7,000 and 8,000 feet equivalencies and the accompanying rates of AMS and discomfort.

As altitude increased, mean oxygen saturation decreased. At 8,000 feet it reached the maximum decrease of 4.4 percentage points, according to the study.

AMS, the mildest and most common form of high altitude illnesses, was recorded in 7.4 percent of participants, but the incidences did not vary between different altitudes. Generally, the greater the altitude, the greater the discomfort -- with the worst at 7,000 to 8,000 feet, and discomfort beginning around 3 to 9 hours into the simulated flight. People over 60 were less likely to report discomfort and men appeared to be more affected overall than women.

"There were no health effects, but the discomfort was there," Thibeault said. "What they were trying to do in this study is isolate one factor, which is altitude, so you can't blame these effects on other factors."

Boeing is scheduled to publically unveil its 787 -- which will sport a cabin pressurized to 6,000 feet -- on Sunday.

"The 787 is one of our first airplanes with the fuselage made out of composites rather than aluminum, a structure that allows us to pressurize to 6,000 feet," said Jeanne Yu, director of environmental performance for Boeing. "The findings of this study, as well as the development of materials technology, enable us to fly the 787."

FMI: www.boeing.com, www.iata.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.04.25): Cooperative Surveillance

Cooperative Surveillance Any surveillance system, such as secondary surveillance radar (SSR), wide-area multilateration (WAM), or ADS-B, that is dependent upon the presence of cert>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.04.25)

Aero Linx: OX5 Aviation Pioneers Incorporated in 1955 as a Pa 501 (c)(3) Not for Profit Corporation, the OX5 Aviation Pioneers is dedicated to bringing before the public the accomp>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Extra Flugzeugproduktions EA 300/SC

The Pilot Appeared To Regain Control After Six Rotations And Attempted To “Fly Out” Inverted But Had Insufficient Altitude On November 8, 2025, at 1038 eastern standard>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Bally Bomber - The All Time Ultimate Warbird Replica?

From 2018 (YouTube Edition): Aero-News Talks With The Airplane's Builder One of the many unique airplanes at AirVenture 2018 was a 1/3-scale B-17 bomber built by Jack Bally, who ta>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.05.25)

Aero Linx: Society of U.S. Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) The Society of US Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) serves to advance the science and art of Aerospace Medicine and its allie>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC