We Fought This Before; Don't Let Them Get Away With It!
When Aero-News led the fight to halt
forced "demilitarization" (destruction) of your property both three
and two years ago, we were able to shake up our electeds enough
that they removed the language from their Defense Authorization
Bills. ANN Reader Scott reminded us that it's time to nail this
vulture while it's in the nest; it's back!
In years past, the sponsors fo the bills played a shell game,
changing the bills' numbers, to make our objections harder to
coordinate; expect the same again. Your representatives and
senators (most of them, anyway), listened to you the last time --
call, write, e-mail -- and don't let them forget how darned riled
up this stunt makes you!
It's time to fight 'em again.
This year, the Bills (HR 1588 and S 747) aren't quite as
treacherous on the surface; but they will be, if allowed
to pass. Here's what the problem is:
The Department of Defense often sells surplus equipment,
manuals, clothing, weapons, and machinery to the public. Before it
leaves DoD authority, it is demilitarized, or "demil'd." Once in a
while, the DoD screws up, and gets embarrassed by a piece of
equipment that hasn't been demil'd enough, or that was sold, say,
as WWI or WWII surplus, when the destruction of equipment that was
going into the public's hands wasn't driven by so much governmental
paranoia.
Now, though, all your military things -- your Civil
War-era caplock rifle, the VFW's old howitzer, or your F-86 -- can
be recalled at the DoD's whim. You will have three
"choices:"
1) You can destroy it at your expense
2) You can pay somebody else to destroy it at your expense,
or
3) The government will destroy it, and you get to pay the shipping,
for the destruction of your own property, that the government
already sold you!
This year's language is a tiny bit sneakier, in that it
specifically exempts the Defense Civilian Marksmanship Program M-1
Garands that are out there (did you save your receipt?); but if
your heirloom Garand (or any other weapon!) came from some other
source, you're out of luck.
"Significant military equipment" specifically includes such
items as some clothing, camping gear, manuals (including the B-17
repair manual, for instance). In case the government finds out you
have anything it doesn't want you to have, there is also this handy
catch-all, that will force you to give up for destruction, "any
other article designated by the Department of Defense as requiring
demilitarization."
Here's the section, from the Senate version [in HR 1588, it's
Section 1044; language is virtually identical --ed.]:
S.747
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Introduced
in Senate)
SEC. 1047. AUTHORITY TO ENSURE DEMILITARIZATION OF SIGNIFICANT
MILITARY EQUIPMENT FORMERLY OWNED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
(a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 153 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after section 2582 the following new
section:
`Sec. 2583. Continued authority to require demilitarization of
significant military equipment after disposal
`(a) AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE DEMILITARIZATON- The Secretary of
Defense may require any person in possession of significant
military equipment formerly owned by the Department of
Defense--
`(1) to demilitarize the equipment;
`(2) to have the equipment demilitarized by a third party;
or
`(3) to return the equipment to the U.S. Government for
demilitarization.
`(b) COST AND VALIDATION OF DEMILITARIZATION- When the
demilitarization of significant military equipment is carried out
by the person in possession of the equipment pursuant to paragraph
(1) or (2) of subsection (a), the person shall be solely
responsible for all demilitarization costs, and the United States
shall have the right to validate that the equipment has been
demilitarized.
`(c) RETURN OF EQUIPMENT TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT- When
the Secretary of Defense requires the return of significant
military equipment for demilitarization by the United States
Government, the Secretary shall bear all costs to transport and
demilitarize the equipment. If the person in possession of the
significant military equipment obtained the property in the manner
authorized by law or regulation and the Secretary determines that
the cost to demilitarize and return the property to the person is
prohibitive, the Secretary shall reimburse the person for the fair
market value of the property or, if the fair market value is not
readily ascertainable, the purchase cost of the property and for
the reasonable transportation costs incurred by the person to
purchase the equipment.
`(d) ESTABLISHMENT OF DEMILITARIZATON STANDARDS- The Secretary
of Defense may prescribe by regulation what constitutes
demilitarization for each type of significant military
equipment.
`(e) EXCEPTIONS- This section does not apply--
`(1) when a person is in possession of significant equipment
formerly owned by the Department of Defense for the purpose of
demilitarizing the equipment pursuant to a United States Government
contract;
`(2) to small arms weapons issued under the Defense Civilian
Marksmanship Program established in title 36, United States
Code;
`(3) to issues by the Department of Defense to museums where
demilitarization has been performed in accordance with departmental
regulations; and
`(4) to other issues and undemilitarized significant military
equipment under the provisions of departmental regulations.
`(f) DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT MILITARY EQUIPMENT- In this
section, the term `significant military equipment' means--
`(1) an article for which special export controls are warranted
under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.) because
of its capacity for substantial military utility or capability, as
identified on the United States Munitions List maintained under
sect 121.1 of title 22, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`(2) any other article designated by the Department of Defense
as requiring demilitarization before its disposal.'.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning
of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new
item:
`2583. Continued authority to require demilitarization of
significant military equipment after disposal.'.
[Aero-News will soon be publishing lists of telephones and
e-mails of key congressional offices. Don't let them get away with
it! --ed]