FAA Rejects GA Input On Phoenix Class B Redesign | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.14.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.16.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Wed, Aug 15, 2007

FAA Rejects GA Input On Phoenix Class B Redesign

AOPA Says Pilot Comments Went Unheeded

The FAA is modifying a huge swath of airspace in the Phoenix area... without listening to local pilots.

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association reports that in the FAA's recently-released final rule on the Phoenix Class B airspace redesign, the FAA rejected most of the recommendations made by AOPA and local pilots. The only positive change -- one supported by AOPA -- is that the ceiling of the Class B airspace will be lowered from 10,000 to 9,000 feet MSL.

The changes -- first considered in February 2006 -- go into effect October 25.

"It is unfortunate that the FAA chose to ignore our plan, which was much simpler and addressed concerns raised by local pilots," said Heidi Williams, AOPA director of air traffic services. "The GA users' plan would have aligned many of the sectors with ground features or navaids, making it much easier for pilots to locate sector boundaries and remain in the appropriate airspace."

AOPA is also concerned about the FAA's plan to lower the airspace floor east of Phoenix, a change that compresses traffic over noise-sensitive areas or forces pilots to climb over higher terrain.

Back in July, AOPA presented a simpler plan... one the pilot advocacy group says was supported widely by the aviation community. In its final rule, the FAA said it was concerned about possible traffic conflicts between airliners descending for landing at Sky Harbor Airport and GA traffic using an established VFR flyway east of the airport.

"Ironically, the FAA is implementing a plan that creates more complex airspace. This could lead to more inadvertent incursions and jeopardize safety," Williams said.

FMI: Read The FAA's Decision (.pdf), www.aopa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The PB4Y-2 Privateer - A Priceless Aero-Treasure

From 2015 (YouTube Version): Oshkosh Reveals Many Treasures... Including Old Warbirds Full Of History While at EAA AirVenture 2015, ANN News Editor, Tom Patton, ventured out to vis>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.14.25)

"The aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 Knots IAS at about 08:08:42 UTC and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.14.25): Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR)

Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) A TFR is a regulatory action issued by the FAA via the U.S. NOTAM System, under the authority of United States Code, Title 49. TFRs are issued wi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.14.25)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders, a leading humanitarian aviation charity, uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC