Supreme Court Won't Step In Over Air Corridors | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Jan 23, 2010

Supreme Court Won't Step In Over Air Corridors

SCOTUS Declines To Hear Rockland County NY Case

The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday it would not consider a case brought by Rockland County, New York, in an attempt to block implementation of an FAA plan to re-direct air traffic. The county held that the new plan would send hundreds of additional flights over the region every day.

Rockland County sits under a proposed air corridor for flights inbound to Newark Liberty International Airport. But the appeal was considered a long shot from the beginning because there had to be legal deficiencies in the lower court's decision to warrant a review by the Supreme Court. It's not enough that the county disagreed with the lower court's ruling.

"While not unexpected, I'm extremely disappointed that the Supreme Court would not hear our case," said County Executive C.Scott Vanderhoef. "I still believe that we have a strong case that the FAA erred in its approach to the redesign."

The Lower Hudson Valley online news site lohud.com reports that Vanderhoef and Democratic U.S. Representative Eliot Engel contend that the FAA did not follow proper procedures for assessing the environmental impact and noise mitigation in designing the new corridors. The FAA wants to implement a complete re-design of air traffic the New York-New Jersey-Philadelphia metro area. Currently, flights into Newark approach from the west over Orange county. The redesign would place as many as 600 additional flights a day over Rockland County.

The decision by SCOTUS leaves no other legal recourse for the county, but Vanderhoef and Engel said they would now pursue a political tactic in an effort to stop implementation of the new air traffic corridors.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.19.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22T

During The 7 Second Descent, There Was Another TAWS Alert At Which Time The Engine Remained At Full Power On October 24, 2025 at 2115 mountain daylight time, a Cirrus SR22T, N740TS>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Red Tail Project--Carrying the Torch of the Tuskegee Airmen

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Educational Organization Aims to Inspire by Sharing Tuskegee Story Founding leader Don Hinz summarized the Red Tail Project’s mission in simple, >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.19.25)

“This feels like an important step since space travel for people with disabilities is still in its very early days... I’m so thankful and hope it inspires a change in m>[...]

Airborne 12.17.25: Skydiver Hooks Tail, Cooper Rotax Mount, NTSB v NDAA

Also: New Katanas, Kern County FD Training, IndiGo’s Botched Roster, MGen. Leavitt Named ERAU Dean The Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) has wrapped up its inves>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC