NTSB Knocks Boeing, FAA for Preventable Door Blowout | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.20.25

Fri, Jun 27, 2025

NTSB Knocks Boeing, FAA for Preventable Door Blowout

Investigators Say the Incident ‘Never Should Have Happened’

The National Transportation Safety Board has published its findings on an incident in 2024 involving a door panel flying off of an Alaska Airlines B737 MAX 9. Investigators all seem to agree that the event was completely preventable, citing poor training at Boeing and insufficient FAA oversight.

The incident involved a door panel detaching mid-flight, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage but, miraculously, no injuries. Faulting both the FAA and Boeing for overlooking multiple red flags, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy was not scared to say that the accident “never should have happened” during a recent public hearing.

The NTSB explained that Boeing lacked structured training for workers tasked with removing and reinstalling door plugs, which are critical components to cabin pressurization. Instead, employees learned through informal, on-the-job methods. Investigators also found Boeing’s work documentation process to be flawed, with no clear record of who performed maintenance on the failed aircraft.

Meanwhile, the FAA was criticized for ineffective audits, oversight gaps, and a failure to detect or correct Boeing’s quality control lapses. Homendy added that she had “lots of questions about where the FAA was during all of this.”

The NTSB recommended improvements to Boeing’s training and documentation systems. While these comments cannot be enforced, Boeing and fuselage supplier Spirit AeroSystems have already begun implementing changes, including a new door plug retention system. This is now undergoing FAA certification.

The FAA responded by noting it has since increased its on-site presence at Boeing facilities, capped 737 MAX production, and required more audits and inspections. But even former FAA leadership admitted the agency had been “too hands off” in its regulatory role.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.24.25): Intermediate Fix/Initial Approach Waypoint

IF/IAWP- Intermediate Fix/Initial Approach Waypoint The waypoint where the final approach course of a T approach meets the crossbar of the T. When designated (in conjunction with a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.24.25)

Aero Linx: Latin American Civil Aviation Commission (LACAC) The Latin American Civil Aviation Commission, LACAC, is an international organization with a consultative character, and>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Upgrading The Future - Profiling the Stratos 716X

From 2018 (YouTube Edition): Stratos Jets Will Initially Be Offered As Kits Stratos Aircraft presented an update on its VLJ program and introduced the Stratos 716 model at AirVentu>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.25.25)

"As we approach the 24th anniversary of 9/11, it is imperative that we continue to honor those lost by implementing a critical aviation security regulation designed to prevent a re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC