Airbus and Air France Go To Court over 2009 Crash | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.10.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.07.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Oct 14, 2022

Airbus and Air France Go To Court over 2009 Crash

Victim's Families See Manslaughter Charges Levied Against Companies for Fatal Incident

A longstanding effort to bring Airbus and Air France to court over the deaths of 228 victims aboard a Rio de Janeiro to Paris flight in 2009 have borne fruit, with the company heads present in a French courthouse to see their firms charged with involuntary manslaughter.

If convicted, the companies will face a fine of $225,000 euros each, a pittance in monetary terms for such corporations but a loss of face nonetheless. Families of the victims have received previous compensation for their loss, but have insisted on seeing the trial through despite years of denials through the legal process. One of the plaintiffs said that the very presence of the companies in court was a "great victory" following "years of ups and downs".  

Both Airbus and Air France maintain that no criminal mistakes were made and that AF447 was a case of pilot error. The flight crashed on June 1st, 2009, when an Airbus A330 was caught in a thunderstorm that began a chain of events that eventually led to the plane crashing into the Atlantic between Brazil and West Africa. Investigation determined that pitot static icing resulted in inaccurate airspeed indications that quickly disconnected the autopilot before igniting a flurry of activity on the flight deck. The pilots attempted to recover and diagnose the issues but ultimately stalled the aircraft before free falling into the sea.  None aboard survived. 

The trial itself is expected to be a highly technical affair, with an expensive procession of experts expected to delve into myriad aspects of flight safety, technical knowledge, and procedural outcomes while the jury assesses the level of guilt between the two companies. For its part, Air France is accused of insufficiently training its pilots, choosing to employ aviators with insufficient know-how in diagnosing and reacting to inaccurate pitot data. 

Airbus stands accused of underestimating previous malfunctions in a similar vein. Prior to the accident, other A330s had proven faulty in a similar manner, ultimately resulting in a fleetwide redesign and replacement after the accident. Until now, French courts have sided with aviation authorities in the country, believing that the crash was primarily caused by pilot error. Intervention on the part of pilot unions, plaintiffs, and prosecutors prevailed in 2021 when the court overruled the previous decision, ordering Airbus and Air France to stand trial. 

FMI: www.airfrance.com

Advertisement

More News

NBAA Responds To GA/BA Operational Restrictions

Bolen Issues Statement Reinforcing Need To Reopen Government The National Business Aviation Association’s President and CEO issued the statement below in response to further >[...]

Boeing Deliveries Surge to Pre-Pandemic Levels

Output May Reach Its Best Since 2018 Despite Trailing Behind Airbus Boeing delivered 53 jets in October, bringing its 2025 total to 493 aircraft and marking its strongest output si>[...]

Spirit Forecasts Financial Turbulence

Low-Cost Airline Admits “Substantial Doubt” It Can Stay Airborne Spirit Airlines has once again found itself in financial trouble, this time less than a year after clai>[...]

Singapore Adds a Price Tag to Going Green

Travelers Leaving Changi Will Soon Pay for Sustainable Fuel Starting April 2026, passengers flying out of Singapore will find a new fee tucked into their tickets: a Sustainable Avi>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Arlie L Raber III Challenger 1

Pilot Was Having Difficulty Controlling The Airplane’S Rudder Pedals Due To His Physical Stature Analysis: The pilot was having difficulty controlling the airplane’s ru>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC