Illinois Appeals Court Puts Halt To O'Hare Expansion Plans | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jan 12, 2009

Illinois Appeals Court Puts Halt To O'Hare Expansion Plans

Decision Puts $20 Billion OMP In Doubt

In a major setback for plans to expand Chicago O'Hare Airport, the Illinois appeals court on Thursday prevented the razing of the northeast part of the nearby Village of Bensenville.

As ANN reported, beginning in 2005 the City of Chicago forced some 500 families out of their homes in anticipation of the $20 billion O'Hare Modernization Program. The city wants to bulldoze the empty houses to clear the way for expanding the busy airport, but opponents to that plan -- including current Bensenville residents, who'd prefer not to have to move -- cite the potential for "severe consequences to public health" if those old homes are torn down.

Understandably, village President John Geils called the court decision a victory for residents of his community. "On top of commandeering our neighborhoods, the City of Chicago has been planning to risk the health and safety of Bensenville residents. The city's planned actions are reckless and deplorable, and the Illinois Court of Appeals is right to stop them."

Opponents to the expansion plan note work on the O'Hare expansion has not begun, and funding for the $20 billion project has not been secured. They also say FAA studies show that the expansion will not provide any significant improvement of airline delays at O'Hare; to the contrary, aviation experts say that OMP will instead produce massive delays and increase costs for both consumers and airlines during and after initial construction.

In addition, the airlines, including United Airlines and American Airlines, have called the OMP plan "ill-conceived" and "premature."

"The real story here is that OMP is nothing more than a $20 billion, taxpayer funded slush fund for politicians and their friends," says Geils. "The simple fact is that OMP is a runway to nowhere."

FMI: www.stop-omp.org

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.09.25)

“We respectfully call on the City of Mesa to: 1. Withdraw the landing fee proposal immediately 2. Engage with the aviation community before making decisions that impact safet>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.09.25): High Speed Taxiway

High Speed Taxiway A long radius taxiway designed and provided with lighting or marking to define the path of aircraft, traveling at high speed (up to 60 knots), from the runway ce>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.09.25)

Aero Linx: International Federation of Airworthiness (IFA) IFA uniquely combines together all those with responsibility for policies, principles and practices concerned with the co>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Diamond Aircraft Ind Inc DA20C1 (A1); Robinson Helicopter R44

Controller’s Expectation That VW02 Would Have Departed Sooner Led To An Inadequate Scan And Loss Of Situational Awareness Analysis: A Robinson R-44 helicopter N744AF, VW02 (V>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC