ISS Refuge: It Would Be Crowded | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Apr 20, 2005

ISS Refuge: It Would Be Crowded

Chiao Says Saving Shuttle Crew Would Mean Cramped Spaces

Since the destruction of the space shuttle Columbia two years ago, NASA (and a lot of the people who watch over the space agency) has been all about contingency planning -- making shuttle flights safer. So it's no wonder that some, including astronauts themselves, are thinking, "What if...?"

Asked what if a shuttle crew had to abandon ship and take refuge aboard the International Space Station, the outgoing commander of the ISS, American Leroy Chiao, suggested the station would become a very crowded place.

"Having the shuttle crew as well as the long-duration (space station) crew members is going to be strain," he said in a recent news conference. Chiao was quoted by Reuters.

But strain or not, that's the plan. If, after its launch sometime between May 15th and June 3rd, the shuttle runs into problems so bad that it can't get back to Earth, the space plane is to dock with the space station and the crew will stay there until a rescue mission can be mounted.

Discovery's mission in the Return To Flight will include a trip to the ISS. Just before docking, Commander Eileen Collins will rotate the ship so that the crew on board the station can inspect it for damage.

Investigators said Columbia was destroyed because super-heated gases were able to penetrate a hole punched in the wing by a piece of insulating foam that fell from the shuttle's external fuel tank upon launch.

But the station, short-staffed since the Columbia tragedy two years ago, is a much more crowded place now than it was then.

"There's a lot more stuff here -- more equipment, more spare parts and more trash that hasn't been able to go down (back to Earth) because of a lack of shuttles," said Flight Engineer John Phillips.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, NatÂ’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.06.25)

“This delivery represents more than just a milestone. It symbolizes our shared commitment to national security and our unwavering support for the men and women who serve on t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.06.25)

Aero Linx: Vintage Wings of Canada Foundation Vintage Wings of Canada is a not-for-profit, charitable organization with a collection of historically significant aircraft and is run>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Portrait of the Army Aviation Heritage Foundation

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): To Preserve and Teach Incorporated as a non-profit domestic corporation in June 1997, the Army Aviation Heritage Foundation (AAHF) is a one-of-a-kind, >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 07.01.25: Volocopter Returns, B23 Energic, Iran Tech In UAVs?

Also: Air Taxis May Be Close, AgEagle Sells 100th, VAI Likes Bedford, AURA AERO Cleans Up Volocopter has resumed work towards the certification of its VoloCity eVTOL, this time und>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC