Proponents Of New FL Airport Go Before Federal Panel | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Fri, Jan 25, 2008

Proponents Of New FL Airport Go Before Federal Panel

Relocation Faces Opposition From Three Organizations

The new Panama City-Bay County International Airport in Florida has faced what proponents hope will be the final legal hurdle to the start of construction. On Wednesday, airport proponents went before a three-judge federal panel in New York City to confront three organizations trying to stop construction of the new, 1,300-acre facility.

As ANN reported, the airport was approved by the FAA for a $72 million airport improvement grant last May, and got its final sign-off from the US Army Corps of Engineers in August. At that point, it was set to become the first new commercial airport built in the US in a decade.

In an odd sort of "reverse-NIMBY" battle, new homes were built too close to the old Bay County International Airport, making it impossible to build a runway extension needed to accommodate large airliners. Then, when plans were made to close and relocate the airport to the south, residents protested the resulting longer drive to catch flights. Some taxpayers also complained about the new facility's $330 million price tag.

Wednesday's arguments, however, took place between the Airport Authority and US Justice Department on the side of the airport, and The Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Defenders of Wildlife, and a pilots group called Friends of PFN against the relocation. The Panama City News Herald reports  he three groups sued to overturn the FAA’s "record of decision," claiming the decision was arbitrary, violated established procedures, and would lead to destruction of environmentally sensitive wetlands in the West Bay area.

Airport Authority attorney Michael Duncan told the paper in a phone interview after the hearing that he was in the courtroom, and after going through the entire record of decision, "we are still confident that the FAA was not arbitrary or capricious in its actions."

Duncan says this was the final hearing on the merits of the suit, but there was no word from the three appellate judges on when a decision might be expected.

FMI: www.pcairport.com, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.25)

Aero Linx: International Federation of Airworthiness (IFA) We aim to be the most internationally respected independent authority on the subject of Airworthiness. IFA uniquely combi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Virtual Reality Painting--PPG Leverages Technology for Training

From 2019 (YouTube Edition): Learning To Paint Without Getting Any On Your Hands PPG's Aerospace Coatings Academy is a tool designed to teach everything one needs to know about all>[...]

Airborne 05.02.25: Joby Crewed Milestone, Diamond Club, Canadian Pilot Insurance

Also: Sustainable Aircraft Test Put Aside, More Falcon 9 Ops, Wyoming ANG Rescue, Oreo Cookie Into Orbit Joby Aviation has reason to celebrate, recently completing its first full t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC