FAA Says Proposed Massachusetts Wind Turbine Too Tall | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Jan 11, 2010

FAA Says Proposed Massachusetts Wind Turbine Too Tall

Planned Structure Is 5.5 Miles From New Bedford Regional Airport

One of two wind turbines proposed by the city of Dartmouth, Massachusetts could interfere with air navigation, the FAA has told the city. The FAA said that the planned 462 foot structure "exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference" for aircraft approaching new Bedford Regional Airport.

According to Southcoast Today, the FAA recommends lowering the overall height of the structure to 417 feet from blade tip to base, or, if an independent analysis of the terrain meets with FAA approval, reducing the structure to 428 feet.

The FAA ruling applies only to the north turbine. The agency is still considering the south structure. Dr. Ronald DiPippo, chairman of the town's Alternative Energy Committee, told the paper the height of the pole to the hub would have to be reduced 35 feet to meet the 428 foot maximum. Select Board Chairman Joseph L. Michaud said the town will conduct a site survey and attempt to win FAA approval the taller tower. He said he expects the south turbine to be approved at 462 feet because it is further from the airport.

DiPippo said the town expects to save over $500,000 in the first year in energy costs by constructing the two turbines on land the municipality owns. But, he said, that would have been about $100,000 more if the taller tower could have been built.

The paper reports that the council members are not entirely surprised the FAA came back proposing changes. "We figured there would be some adjustments to the project," Michaud said. "It's not a major adjustment and it should be more favorable with the people who have concerns about the height."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC