Inadequate Planning Blamed In Wings Over Dallas Mid-Air Collision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Fri, Dec 13, 2024

Inadequate Planning Blamed In Wings Over Dallas Mid-Air Collision

NTSB Cites Shortcomings In Prebriefing, Oversight, And Risk Control

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in a media release on December 9, points to inadequate planning as the primary factor leading to the fatal mid-air collision of a Boeing B-17G bomber and a Bell P-63F fighter during the Wings Over Dallas air show in November 2022 at Dallas Executive Airport in Texas.

The pilot, copilot, flight engineer, and two scanners in the B-17G and the pilot of the P-63F were fatally injured and both airplanes were destroyed. Both aircraft were operated by the Commemorative Air Force (CAF).

The accident occurred as the eight airplanes in the performance were completing a repositioning turn that involved a 90-degree right turn followed by a 270-degree left turn. The P-63F was in a descending left turn when it struck the left wing of the B-17G from behind.

Using data analysis from a visibility simulation that modeled the aircraft flight paths, altitudes, and roll angles of the airplanes, NTSB investigators determined that the pilots had limited ability to see and avoid each other’s aircraft. This was attributed to the geometry of the flight paths, and obscuration of the pilots’ out-the-window views by aircraft structures.

The NTSB concluded that there was a lack of a prebriefed aircraft separation plan as well as administrative actions to address the predictable risks associated with the series of maneuvers planned for the performance.

Investigators turned up additional safety issues including the lack of a risk assessment plan, unclear communication orders, a lack of requirements for recurrent evaluation of air bosses, inadequate air show safety assessment and reporting issues within the CAF, and insufficient regulatory oversight.

The NTSB also concluded that the circumstances of the accident accentuate the inherent limitations of the see-and-avoid concept for collision avoidance, particularly in the rapidly-moving environment of an air show performance involving multiple dissimilar aircraft.

FMI:  https://www.ntsb.gov/

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Aviat A1

Airplane Bounced About 3 Ft Then Touched Back Down And Then, With No Brakes Applied, The Airplane Began Veering To The Left Analysis: The pilot entered the airport traffic pattern >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.08.25)

Aero Linx: British Microlight Aircraft Association (BMAA) The primary focus within all aviation activity is SAFETY. In all aspects of our sport SAFETY must come first, whether it b>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Fly Corvair’s Reliable Engine Alternative

From SnF25 (YouTube Edition): William Wynne Builds Practical Aircraft Engines on the Corvair Platform Seeking an affordable alternative to the traditional aircraft engine options, >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CiES Fuel-Quantity and e-Throttle Systems Praised

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Bridge of CiES CiES Inc. is a Bend, Oregon-based designer and manufacturer of modular embedded aircraft systems and sensors. The company’s fuel-l>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC