Airplane ‘Impounded’ In U.K. Allowed To Fly Out Of Closed Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Sep 02, 2015

Airplane ‘Impounded’ In U.K. Allowed To Fly Out Of Closed Airport

Pilot Had Landed As Weather Deteriorated Three Weeks Ago

Pilot Martyn Ferid did what any safe pilot would do in such a situation. He was flying from Cornwall to Kent in the U.K. in his vintage Jodel airplane when the weather soured. He looked for a place to land safely, and his best choice was a closed airport at Plymouth on the south coast of Devon, England. He landed safely.

But that’s when the trouble began. Ferid's Jodel was impounded by the leaseholder of the former airport, Sutton Harbour Holdings (SHH). They said the landing was an act of “trespass,” and would not let Ferid fly his airplane away when the weather cleared.

That was on August 9th.

SHH went so far as to place a large block of concrete in front of the airplane so it could not be moved. They said it would have to be trucked off the field, because it was not safe to take off from the former airport.

The BBC reports that the story does have a reasonable ending. On August 28th, Ferid was finally allowed to fly the Jodel back home. after he was able to validate the plane’s airworthiness and prove he had liability insurance. But getting the plane back off the ground took the intervention of AOPA U.K., and Charles Strasser, the founder of the U.K.’s “Strasser Scheme” which is endorsed by all but five airfields in the U.K. The Strasser Scheme basically calls for the waiver of any landing fees associated with a genuine emergency landing, diversion, or cautionary procedure. Field’s landing at Plymouth fell into that latter category.

In a statement, SHH said that its position had been “quite clear” through the entire proceeding. “We had to be satisfied that any decision we made ensured that this aircraft was able to leave safely,” the statement said.

Ferid, an experienced pilot and instructor, said he was “glad to have the airplane back and that this saga is over.”

(Image from unrelated YouTube video. Not incident airplane)

FMI: www.aopa.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=157&Itemid=816

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC