NIMBYs At Work: California Resolution Backs Helo Restrictions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Jan 30, 2012

NIMBYs At Work: California Resolution Backs Helo Restrictions

Critics: Flights Causing Most Noise Would Be Exempted

A California lawmaker has introduced a bill in the state legislature which supports the idea of federal restrictions on noisy, low-flying helicopters over Los Angeles neighborhoods. But opponents, including helo operators, say most of the helicopters riling the neighbors would be exempt, and the proposed restrictions would achieve little as a result.

Mike Feuer, a Los Angeles Democrat, introduced a resolution January 24 asking the California Legislature to support the Los Angeles Residential Helicopter Noise Relief Act of 2011, a federal proposal which has a version under consideration in both the House and Senate. Feuer says, "For far too long, residential neighborhoods have had to deal with increasing noise and other burdens from helicopters. This is a major quality of life issue throughout our region. The California Legislature should urge Congress to act this year."

But the North Hollywood Patch reports Larry Welk, president of the Professional Helicopter Pilots Association, told NBC Los Angeles the legislation would exempt all helicopters flown by fire and police departments, the Department of Water and Power , and other government agencies. Also exempted would be emergency responders such as air ambulance helicopters. Some LA residents note that low-flying police choppers, which may circle over a fixed spot for long periods, are the worst offenders, and would not be covered by the bill.

Welk adds that the proposal is based on "a public perception that there's more helicopter traffic. That's just not true. There used to be six, seven traffic helicopters in the air. News stations that used to have two now have one, some have none. The fact is, this legislation exempts 70 percent of the helicopters that generate the noise."

One Patch reader concurs, observing, "If they are going to exempt LAPD helicopters, which are the loudest and most obnoxious, we might as well not have any regulations because the noise problem won't be solved."

FMI: Feuer's Resolution

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC