Suspicious? UAV Company Fined By The FAA Involved In Lawsuit Against The Agency | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 08, 2015

Suspicious? UAV Company Fined By The FAA Involved In Lawsuit Against The Agency

SkyPan International Fined $1.9 Million For Alleged 'Unauthorized Operations'

Tuesday, the FAA announced that it was proposing a $1.9 million fine against Chicago-based UAV photography company SkyPan International. It was the largest fine ever imposed against a UAV operator ... by $1,890,000.

SkyPan is one of several companies that is involved in a lawsuit against the FAA that hold that the agency can't make UAV operations illegal in the absence of formal small UAV regulations. The FAA's Congressionally-mandated deadline for such regulations came and went on September 30th.

The website motherboard.vice.com reports that SkyPan has been engaged in aerial photography for 27 years using both manned and now unmanned aircraft. It currently holds a Section 333 exemption for commercial UAV operation granted in April of this year.

But the FAA alleges that prior to obtaining the Section 333 exemption, Skypan flew at least 65 "unauthorized operations in some of our most congested airspace and heavily populated cities, violating airspace regulations and various operating rules. These operations were illegal and not without risk." Many were said to be violations of Class B airspace in New York and Chicago.

The FAA does not list specific instances of alleged violations in its letter to SkyPan, but does appear to have such detailed information.

SkyPan told motherboard.vice.com that it was still digesting the FAA's letter, and could not comment.

(Image from file)

FMI: http://skypanintl.com, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC