Pentagon Reportedly Overcharging Armed Forces For Fuel | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, May 27, 2017

Pentagon Reportedly Overcharging Armed Forces For Fuel

Using Surpluses For A Variety Of Purposes

The Pentagon has reportedly been overcharging its armed services for fuel, including aviation fuel, to generate extra money for training Syrian rebels, bolster a prescription drug program, and cover unbudgeted costs for the war in Afghanistan.

MSN reports that as much as $6 billion has been generated by overcharging for fuel over the past seven years. 

Since WWII, the Defense Department has used a system under which it purchases fuel centrally and then sells it to the various armed services, which pay for the fuel out of their own budgets. It was intended to reduce redundancy and be more efficient. The Pentagon buys about 4.2 billion gallons of fuel each year.

But according to the report, the services have been charged up to $1 per gallon more than airlines pay for jet fuel on the open market, which has led to what some critics call a "bishop's fund" of $6 billion. 

Congress is aware of the practice, and has routinely approved of the Pentagon's request to divert excess money from fuel sales to other programs as a way of balancing the DOD's checkbook. But some are now asking questions about the practice that has resulted in what has been called a "slush fund" for the Pentagon.

In a statement, the Pentagon admitted that it had collected what it described as "enterprise gains" in the amount of $5.6 billion between 2010 and 2016, but said the discrepancy was due to falling oil prices and an "inherently volatile market."

FMI: Original Report

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC