Nags Head Reconsiders Its Drone Law | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sun, Sep 09, 2018

Nags Head Reconsiders Its Drone Law

Ordinance Passed Last Year May Step On Federal Toes

The Nags Head, NC Board of Commissioners is revisiting the drone ordinance it passed in March of last year because it may have reached into territory reserved by the federal government.

The the ordinance was on the agenda for the town's September 5 meeting. The updated ordinance was on the "consent agenda" for the meeting, which means it would not be discussed in depth, unless it was pulled for separate consideration by a member of the commission.

According to the summary provided by the town staff to the Commissioners, the changes in the ordinance were as follows:

  • Definitions modified to match FAA definitions; deleted those already defined under FAA rules
  • Deleted the regulation requiring operation of small unmanned aircraft by government agencies as the town cannot regulate flights as they fall under FAA jurisdiction
  • Clarified operation of small unmanned aircrafts (SUA’s) around the Outer Banks Hospital
  • Only FAA can restrict airspace; therefore we removed language that prohibited operation between dusk and dawn and added language that operation must be in accordance with FAA/State laws
  • Deleted language prohibiting use on the public beach because only the FAA can regulate airspace.
  • Modified language regarding flying near public safety incidents from being prohibited - to not interfering with an incident
  • Items covered by the FAA (such as SUA’s powered by rocket, missile, etc.) were deleted
  • Deleted operating requirements for SUA’s as that information is covered by the FAA and the State and those requirements are referenced in the proposed ordinance
  • Deleted reference that prohibited the use of any powered unmanned aircraft.

We are currently working to learn if the ordinance was passed as part of the consent agenda, or if it was pulled for more in-depth discussion.

(Image from file)

FMI: Staff summary

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.03.25)

Aero Linx: Colorado Pilots Association (CPA) Colorado Pilots Association was incorporated as a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation in 1972. It is a statewide organization with over 700 >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.03.25): High Speed Taxiway

High Speed Taxiway A long radius taxiway designed and provided with lighting or marking to define the path of aircraft, traveling at high speed (up to 60 knots), from the runway ce>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC