Lidle's Lawyer Says SR20 Controls Were 'Jammed' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Thu, Apr 28, 2011

Lidle's Lawyer Says SR20 Controls Were 'Jammed'

Claims That The Pilot 'Bent The Controls' Trying To Fly The Plane

The lawyer representing the family of New York Yankees pitcher Cory Lidle, who along with his instructor was fatally injured when the Cirrus SR20 he had recently purchased and was flying impacted the side of a building on Manhattan's Upper East Side, told a jury in opening statements Wednesday that the plane's controls were "jammed" due to a design defect in the aircraft.


Cirrus SR20 File Photo

Attorney Todd Macaluso said in his opening argument that "There is no pilot error,"which was the finding of the NTSB in its probable cause report. "If you can't control the airplane, you can't be at fault. This airplane was out of control," he asserted.

Lidle and his instructor Tylor Stanger were flying in the Hudson river corridor, and Cirrus contends Lidle started a turn too late, which gave himself no opportunity to complete the maneuver. A story in the New York Post reports that Macaluso said that the SR20 was "spinning out of control" when it impacted the building, and that "the plane lost control even before it made the turn." He said Lidle bent the airplane's side stick in an effort to bring the aircraft back under control. He also said the SR20s airframe parachute would have had malfunctioned given the unusual attitude of the aircraft, and that at 1,000ft AGL, it would have made little difference. If the airplane had been functioning properly, he said, "with an instructor on board, they could have easily navigated this."

Bloomberg News reports that Cirrus' attorneys said the company is "genuinely sorry" that the two men lost their lives in the accident, but maintain that "Cirrus did not cause these deaths, and the airplane did not cause these deaths."

Lidle's widow is seeking $50 million from Cirrus.

(Editors' Note) The NY Post also reports that Mancuso said that the jammed controls were due to a "design flaw after the 'jet' was rushed into production." If true, we'll see how far that body of aviation knowledge takes him in this case.

FMI: www.nysd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC