ISS Refuge: It Would Be Crowded | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Wed, Apr 20, 2005

ISS Refuge: It Would Be Crowded

Chiao Says Saving Shuttle Crew Would Mean Cramped Spaces

Since the destruction of the space shuttle Columbia two years ago, NASA (and a lot of the people who watch over the space agency) has been all about contingency planning -- making shuttle flights safer. So it's no wonder that some, including astronauts themselves, are thinking, "What if...?"

Asked what if a shuttle crew had to abandon ship and take refuge aboard the International Space Station, the outgoing commander of the ISS, American Leroy Chiao, suggested the station would become a very crowded place.

"Having the shuttle crew as well as the long-duration (space station) crew members is going to be strain," he said in a recent news conference. Chiao was quoted by Reuters.

But strain or not, that's the plan. If, after its launch sometime between May 15th and June 3rd, the shuttle runs into problems so bad that it can't get back to Earth, the space plane is to dock with the space station and the crew will stay there until a rescue mission can be mounted.

Discovery's mission in the Return To Flight will include a trip to the ISS. Just before docking, Commander Eileen Collins will rotate the ship so that the crew on board the station can inspect it for damage.

Investigators said Columbia was destroyed because super-heated gases were able to penetrate a hole punched in the wing by a piece of insulating foam that fell from the shuttle's external fuel tank upon launch.

But the station, short-staffed since the Columbia tragedy two years ago, is a much more crowded place now than it was then.

"There's a lot more stuff here -- more equipment, more spare parts and more trash that hasn't been able to go down (back to Earth) because of a lack of shuttles," said Flight Engineer John Phillips.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Aviat A1

Airplane Bounced About 3 Ft Then Touched Back Down And Then, With No Brakes Applied, The Airplane Began Veering To The Left Analysis: The pilot entered the airport traffic pattern >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.08.25)

Aero Linx: British Microlight Aircraft Association (BMAA) The primary focus within all aviation activity is SAFETY. In all aspects of our sport SAFETY must come first, whether it b>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Fly Corvair’s Reliable Engine Alternative

From SnF25 (YouTube Edition): William Wynne Builds Practical Aircraft Engines on the Corvair Platform Seeking an affordable alternative to the traditional aircraft engine options, >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CiES Fuel-Quantity and e-Throttle Systems Praised

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Bridge of CiES CiES Inc. is a Bend, Oregon-based designer and manufacturer of modular embedded aircraft systems and sensors. The company’s fuel-l>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC