US Court Of Appeals Lifts Stay On Decision To Relocate Panama City Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Tue, Jan 29, 2008

US Court Of Appeals Lifts Stay On Decision To Relocate Panama City Airport

Legal Hurdle Cleared In Construction Of New Airport

Officials with The Panama City-Bay County International Airport and Industrial District (Airport Authority) announced Tuesday the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Court) has vacated its stay that limited construction for the relocation of the Panama City-Bay County International Airport on property donated by The St. Joe Company -- a decision that allows the planned relocation to move forward.

"We are grateful to the Court for its time, attention and judgment," said Airport Authority Vice Chairman Bill Cramer. "We will now move forward with all due speed to complete this project and deliver its aviation, economic and environmental benefits to Bay County and Northwest Florida."

As ANN reported last week, airport proponents went before a three-judge federal panel in New York City January 23 to confront three organizations trying to stop construction of the new, 1,300-acre facility. The airport was approved by the FAA for a $72 million airport improvement grant in May 2007, and got its final sign-off from the US Army Corps of Engineers in August. At that point, it was set to become the first new commercial airport built in the US in a decade.

The Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Defenders of Wildlife, and a recreational pilots group called Friends of PFN sued to overturn the FAA’s "record of decision," claiming the decision was arbitrary, violated established procedures, and would lead to destruction of environmentally sensitive wetlands in the West Bay area.

The order from the Court noted that the four criteria are relevant in considering a stay: "...the likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm if a stay is denied, substantial injury to the party opposing the stay if one is issued and the public interest."

The order concluded, "...having reviewed the briefing on appeal and the administrative record before the agency, and having heard oral arguments on the merits on January 23, 2008, we now conclude that these factors balance in favor of the respondents (The FAA and the Airport Authority)."

"We appreciate the fact that the Court expedited this final hearing," Cramer said.

FMI: www.pcairport.com, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, Nat’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

Klyde Morris (06.30.25)

What Goes Around, May Yet Come Back Around, Klyde FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC