Air Force Finds SpaceX Launches Much Less Expensive Than ULA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Thu, Jul 06, 2017

Air Force Finds SpaceX Launches Much Less Expensive Than ULA

Price Difference As Much As $300 Million Per Launch

Budget estimates recently released by the U.S. Air Force contain what could be very good news for SpaceX, and not so great news for United Launch Alliance.

The 2018 fiscal year estimates show that a typical SpaceX launch for the USAF in 2020 would cost taxpayers about $65 million, while a ULA launch carries a price tag ao $422 million, according to a report from Ars Technica.

But the numbers could be somewhat misleading, according to the report. Due to the constraints of the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, the Air Force must make estimates of launch costs on a single budget line beginning in 2020. The $422 million figure represents a composite number arrived at by Ars Technica after conversations with space policy experts representing that the USAF believes it would have to pay if ULA continued to be the sole provider of its launch services.

But that's no longer the case. SpaceX has already launched one U.S. military satellite into orbit, and has contracts for two others. But the price tag for those exceeds the $65 million estimated in the budget document. One will cost $83 million, while the other is projected at $96.5 million. Ars points out that that seems to be comparable to the "unit cost" listed in the 2020 launch estimate released by the Air Force.

In a Twitter post, Musk said that the "$300M cost diff between SpaceX and Boeing/Lockheed exceeds avg value of satellite, so flying with SpaceX means satellite is basically free."

If the estimates hold up, it could be a boon for SpaceX, and could lead to ULA sharply reducing its asking price in an effort to stay competitive.

ULA CEO Tory Bruno responded on Twitter to the article posted by Ars, saying it was "misleading", but did not provide any updated cost data.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.12.24)

“The legislation now includes a task force with industry representation ensuring that we have a seat at the table and our voice will be heard as conversations about the futur>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.12.24)

Aero Linx: Waco Museum The WACO Historical Society, in addition to preserving aviation's past, is also dedicated and actively works to nurture aviation's future through its Learnin>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.12.24): Adcock Range

Adcock Range National low-frequency radio navigation system (c.1930-c.1950) replaced by an omnirange (VOR) system. It consisted of four segmented quadrants broadcasting Morse Code >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.06.24: 200th ALTO, Rotax SB, Risen 916iSV

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, Does Simming Make Better Pilots?, World Games, AMA National Fun Fly Czech sportplane manufacturer Direct Fly has finished delivering its 200th ALTO NG, the >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC