Nuh-Uh!! Cell Carriers Refuse to Postpone 5G Rollout | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.02.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.03.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.04.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.05.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Tue, Jan 04, 2022

Nuh-Uh!! Cell Carriers Refuse to Postpone 5G Rollout

Contentious Letter to FAA Says They're Overreaching With Demands

Deadlines never seem to be all that important until the 11th hour, and the impending launch of 5G wireless services have once again proved that human behavior can be fairly predictable.

 Verizon Communications and AT&T, the 2 biggest cell operators in the U.S., have told federal transportation authorities that they will no longer postpone the rollout of their new network services, deciding that they have held off long enough. The contentious 5G bands have brought out industry concerns over interference due to their theoretical overlap with radio altimetry frequencies, and possible errors in rangefinding during the landing approach. 

AT&T and Verizon offered a counterproposal that would see their networks operated at lower power output for the first 6 months, matching French regulations as their aviation industry assesses the equipment for interference. The companies had planned their 5G network activation for January 6th in select markets across the United States, the placement of which largely overlaps with some of the bigger, more heavily trafficked airports. The companies addressed Administrator Dickson of the FAA, reminding the agency of their goodwill up to now and sending the message that they can only accommodate the agency’s last-minute demands for so long.

AT&T noted the FCC's initial C-Band Order, repeating its promise that their rules would "protect aeronautical services in the 4.2-4.4 GHz band" and outlining the specific ranges used in their 5G frequencies. The company states that other countries have weathered the rollout to no (known) ill effect, saying "C-Band 5G service and aviation operations already coexist in nearly 40 other countries where C-Band spectrum has been deployed without any negative impact on aviation." 

AT&T takes issue with the last-minute action of the aviation regulators, restating their goodwill shown in November when the FAA requested they postpone 5G rollout. The newer, faster, more advanced network is a key piece of their cellular offerings, one which brings clear opportunity costs if kept from wider market availability. The company feels that the billions spent on building the infrastructure for the network, the immense capital paid for the use of the C-band spectrum, and its previous acquiescence to the FAA have been more than sufficient, and its duty to shareholders and customers now takes precedence. 

"Now, on the evening of New Year’s Eve, just five days before the C-Band spectrum will be deployed, we received [FAA] letter asking us to take still more voluntary steps - to the detriment of our millions of consumer, business and government customers - to once again assist the aviation industry and the FAA after failing to resolve issues in that costly 30-day delay period, which we never considered to be an initial one."

AT&T has had enough, saying that the pathway proposed by the FAA is an overreach that skirts good law and demands the companies give up their operational autonomy. "At its core, your proposed framework asks that we agree to transfer oversight of our companies’ multi-billion dollar investment in 50 unnamed metropolitan areas representing the lion’s share of the U.S. population to the FAA for an undetermined number of months or years. Even worse, the proposal is directed to only two companies, regardless of the terms of licenses auctioned and granted, and to the exception of every other company and industry within the purview of the FCC. Agreeing to your proposal would not only be an unprecedented and unwarranted circumvention of the due process and checks and balances carefully crafted in the structure of our democracy, but an irresponsible abdication of the operating control required to deploy world-class and globally competitive communications networks that are every bit as essential to our country’s economic vitality, public safety and national interests as the airline industry."

FMI: www.fcc.gov, www.faa.gov. www.att.net, www.verizon.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.03.25): No Gyro Approach

No Gyro Approach A radar approach/vector provided in case of a malfunctioning gyro-compass or directional gyro. Instead of providing the pilot with headings to be flown, the contro>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.03.25)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Airborne 05.30.25: Anti-Helicopter Bill, PW Strike Done, All-Electric Bristell

Also: Duffy Wants $$$, KS Airports, Morningside U’s Aviation School, New Airstrip In ID After 6 were killed in a helicopter crash over the Hudson River, several US Representa>[...]

Airborne 05.29.25: ATC Bonu$, VX4 eVTOL Flies, Starship 9 Test

Also: Hermeus Quarterhorse MK1, Seaplane Rating Guide, Vietjet A330neos, SFO Wacky Weed Bust As the air traffic controller shortage trudges on, the US Department of Transportation >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC