Class Action Filed Against Volato for WARN Violation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.02.24

Airborne-NextGen-12.03.24

Airborne-Unlimited-12.04.24

Airborne Flt Training-12.05.24

Airborne-Unlimited-12.06.24

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

Class Action Filed Against Volato for WARN Violation

Employees Allege Mass Layoffs Without Required Notice

Terminated employees have filed a class action lawsuit against Volato for alleged violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Submitted on September 12, the complaint accuses the fractional jet company of failing to provide 60 days’ notice before executing mass layoffs.

The class claimed that, towards the end of August, Volato fired over 233 of their employees without giving any warning. This is a clear breach of the WARN Act, which requires employers with over 100 employees to notify staff members at least 60 days before significant layoffs or plant closings.

The plaintiffs also argue that Volato's actions have deprived them of necessary compensation and benefits, causing significant financial damage.

“This case is about holding Volato accountable for the harm it has caused its employees,” commented Ryan Barack, a Board Certified Labor and Employment Attorney and lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “Employers are required by law to provide notice before significant layoffs, and Volato’s failure to comply with the WARN Act has had a devastating impact on its workforce.”

The layoffs come during a rough period for Volato. The company recently stooped to signing an aircraft management services agreement with a competitor, flyExclusive. This could also allow Volato to be purchased before the terms expire next year.

“This strategic move is expected to strengthen our position in the market and provide new opportunities for growth,” Volato’s termination letters stated. “However, as we transition through this period, it has become necessary to adjust our workforce to better align with our current and future operational needs.”

The plaintiffs are searching for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allowing them to represent all employees affected. Additionally, they are requesting injunctive relief to ensure that Volato adheres to the WARN Act moving forward.

FMI: www.flyvolato.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.06.24): Desired Track

Desired Track The planned or intended track between two waypoints. It is measured in degrees from either magnetic or true north. The instantaneous angle may change from point to po>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.06.24)

“Witnesses have spotted the cluster of what look to be drones and a possible fixed-wing aircraft.” (The statement added that there are similar reports from both public >[...]

Airborne 12.06.24: NJ Drone TFR, Isaacman For NASA Admin, MORE Boeing Woes

Also: Gogo Owns Satcom Direct Now, Airbus Cuts Jobs, A319 Firefighters, CAP Balloon Challenge The FAA has confirmed it issued two Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) in New Jersey>[...]

Airborne 12.02.24: Electra FG EIS, Prez Osprey Problems, Starship Wants 25

Also: EAA Ray Foundation, MagniX Records, Ruko U11MINI Drone, RCAF PC-21s Elektra Solar recently put the first aircraft from its Elektra Trainer Fixed-Gear (FG) family into service>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.07.24): Ultralight Vehicle

Ultralight Vehicle A single-occupant aeronautical vehicle operated for sport or recreational purposes which does not require FAA registration, an airworthiness certificate, or pilo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC