Class Action Filed Against Volato for WARN Violation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

Class Action Filed Against Volato for WARN Violation

Employees Allege Mass Layoffs Without Required Notice

Terminated employees have filed a class action lawsuit against Volato for alleged violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Submitted on September 12, the complaint accuses the fractional jet company of failing to provide 60 days’ notice before executing mass layoffs.

The class claimed that, towards the end of August, Volato fired over 233 of their employees without giving any warning. This is a clear breach of the WARN Act, which requires employers with over 100 employees to notify staff members at least 60 days before significant layoffs or plant closings.

The plaintiffs also argue that Volato's actions have deprived them of necessary compensation and benefits, causing significant financial damage.

“This case is about holding Volato accountable for the harm it has caused its employees,” commented Ryan Barack, a Board Certified Labor and Employment Attorney and lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “Employers are required by law to provide notice before significant layoffs, and Volato’s failure to comply with the WARN Act has had a devastating impact on its workforce.”

The layoffs come during a rough period for Volato. The company recently stooped to signing an aircraft management services agreement with a competitor, flyExclusive. This could also allow Volato to be purchased before the terms expire next year.

“This strategic move is expected to strengthen our position in the market and provide new opportunities for growth,” Volato’s termination letters stated. “However, as we transition through this period, it has become necessary to adjust our workforce to better align with our current and future operational needs.”

The plaintiffs are searching for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allowing them to represent all employees affected. Additionally, they are requesting injunctive relief to ensure that Volato adheres to the WARN Act moving forward.

FMI: www.flyvolato.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.08.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.08.25)

Aero Linx: T-34 Association, Inc. The T-34 Association was formed in July 1975 so that individuals purchasing then military surplus T-34As had an organization which would provide s>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Piper PA-31T3

As He Released The Brakes To Begin Taxiing, The Brake Pedals Went To The Floor With No Braking Action Analysis: The pilot reported that during engine start up, he applied the brake>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.08.25)

“Legislation like the Mental Health in Aviation Act is still imperative to hold the FAA accountable for the changes they clearly acknowledge need to be made... We cannot wait>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC