NATA Responds To New Private Aircraft Security Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.02.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.03.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.04.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.05.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Wed, Sep 12, 2007

NATA Responds To New Private Aircraft Security Rules

Concerned With Effect Of Proposed Rule On Small Operators

As ANN reported, on Tuesday the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency released proposed rules that, if enacted, will require private aircraft operators to submit passenger manifest data prior to any arrival in or departure from the United States.

The proposal will impose passenger and crew manifest requirements on all private aircraft. The requirements are nearly identical to the manifest rules for commercial operators.

"We expect that many of the more sophisticated private aircraft operators, such as larger businesses with an extensive flight department, would be able to adapt to the proposed requirements. However, we are quite concerned with the effect of this rule on the smallest of operators," explained National Air Transportation Association President James K. Coyne.

For instance, NATA notes, currently a flight returning to the US from Canada may make required arrival notifications to the CBP via a radio transmission while en route. This would no longer be permissible under the proposal just released.

The reason the rules now permit a radio transmission is because the aircraft may not be near a telephone. In fact, some aircraft flights may originate from locations without power, let alone a high-speed Internet connection that is necessary to submit the electronic manifest data.

"It appears that these unique operations were not given sufficient consideration in the development of the new requirement," Coyne said. "We will submit detailed comments to the CBP as to how such operations might be better accommodated in the regulations."

"We look forward to working with the CBP to craft final regulations that will not overly restrict the freedom of movement that private aircraft operators cherish," Coyne concluded.

FMI: www.nata.aero, www.dhs.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.02.25): Minimum Friction Level

Minimum Friction Level The friction level specified in AC 150/5320-12, Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces, that represents the m>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.02.25)

Aero Linx: Airpower Museum The APM owns 30 acres on Antique Airfield, including the south half of the N-S runway. It consists of three hangars, an annex, and a library. The museum >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Champion 7ECA

Patient Told The First Responders That The “Man Who Was In The Plane Was Flying At The Time Of The Accident And Had Overshot The Runway They Were Attempting To Land On.&rdquo>[...]

Classic Klyde Morris (From 06.10.22)

Klyde Just Can't Believe This Has Gotten To This Point... FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 05.30.25: Anti-Helicopter Bill, PW Strike Done, All-Electric Bristell

Also: Duffy Wants $$$, KS Airports, Morningside U’s Aviation School, New Airstrip In ID After 6 were killed in a helicopter crash over the Hudson River, several US Representa>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC