Owner Of Damaged TBM Sues FBO, Owner | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Mon, Jan 23, 2012

Owner Of Damaged TBM Sues FBO, Owner

Charges Irresponsibility, Misleading Advertising

The owner of a turboprop aircraft has retained an attorney and filed suit against a Groton, CT FBO and its owner after his plane was damaged by a fuel truck while in for repairs. The FBO acknowledges its role, and says it has insurance, but the lawsuit may be attempting to reach past the corporate "veil" to target the owner personally.

TheDay.com reports George Sampas flew his 2006 Socata TBM (similar plane pictured) to the Groton airport on August 9, 2011 to be repaired by Lanmar Aviation. In his complaint filed in U.S. District Court, Sampas alleges FBO employees completed the repairs, but then backed a fuel truck into the plane, forcing it off its chocks and damaging the tail and fuselage.

The suit claims that Lanmar, and its owner and president, Richard Polidori neglected to maintain standard operating and safety procedures, and adds that that the company's claim of high safety standards in its advertising is misleading. Sampas explained in a phone interview with TheDay, ""The fact that they didn't have adequate safety procedures in place is irresponsible. They advertise themselves as being a safe FBO."

The repairs are estimated at $400,000, but Sampas also wants $20,000 per month for loss of use, and claims that even after repairs, the plane won't be worth what it was before the damage was done. He wants a total of $690,000 in compensation, or for Lanmar to buy the plane from his for what it would have been worth before the accident.

Attorney Steven Arnold is representing Polidori, and has moved to dismiss the suit. He notes that Lanmar, through its insurance company, has acknowledged the company's responsibility, and says Sampas has no grounds to sue Polidori personally.

FMI: www.lanmaraviation.net ; www.tbm850.com

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Lee Aviation LLC JA30 SuperStol

A Puff Of Smoke Came Out From The Top Of The Engine Cowling Followed By A Total Loss Of Engine Power On May 9, 2025, about 1020 mountain daylight time, an experimental amateur-buil>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Curtiss Jenny Build Wows AirVenture Crowds

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Jenny, I’ve Got Your Number... Among the magnificent antique aircraft on display at EAA’s AirVenture 2022 was a 1918 Curtiss Jenny painstak>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.25): Very High Frequency (VHF)

Very High Frequency (VHF) The frequency band between 30 and 300 MHz. Portions of this band, 108 to 118 MHz, are used for certain NAVAIDs; 118 to 136 MHz are used for civil air/grou>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.30.25)

“From approximately November 2021 through January 2022, Britton-Harr, acting on behalf of AeroVanti, entered into lease-purchase agreements for five Piaggio-manufactured airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.31.25): Microburst

Microburst A small downburst with outbursts of damaging winds extending 2.5 miles or less. In spite of its small horizontal scale, an intense microburst could induce wind speeds as>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC