Ukraine May Have Destroyed Russian SU-57 Advanced Fighter | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.10.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.07.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jun 13, 2024

Ukraine May Have Destroyed Russian SU-57 Advanced Fighter

Airfield Hit Deep Behind Russian Lines

The Ukraine Defense Intelligence Agency (GUR) announced on Sunday that it had destroyed one of Russia’s most advanced Su-57 fighter jets in a drone attack on the Akhtubinsk airfield about 589 km (365 mi) inside Russia. 

The agency displayed before and after satellite images of the field that it says show the aircraft damaged after the strike.

The popular pro-Kremlin Telegram channel Fighterbomber claimed that shrapnel from a multiple drone strike on Saturday damaged the jet. Forbes, in a Sunday interview, cited Ukrainian intelligence spokesman Andrjy Yusov as saying there is also preliminary evidence a second Su-57 was damaged. If confirmed, this would be the first successful strike by Ukraine on a Su-57 and if lost, the first one destroyed during combat action.

The Su-57 is a fifth-generation, supersonic twin-engine stealth fighter considered to be Russia’s answer to the U.S. Air Force’s F-22 Raptor. The GUR also posted the Su-57 can carry KH-59 and KH-69 cruise missiles which can be launched as standoff weapons from Russian airspace to strike targets inside Ukraine.

The significance of the strike is twofold. First, it is unclear exactly how many Su-57s are currently deployed by Russia. According to the 2024 World Air Forces Directory, there are currently 14 Su-57s in active service and another 75 on order. If two of them are in fact damaged and one possibly destroyed, Russian air superiority is placed at risk.

Second, according to criticism leveled by Fighterbomber, the strike underscores what is perceived to be a weakness in Russian leadership – slow decision-making and a disregard for protecting its air power assets. This is because Russian air units typically park aircraft in plain view on ramps with no shelter, and the only time aircraft are moved is during active operations. This makes them potentially more vulnerable to the type of strikes that were just experienced. In contrast, Ukrainian aircraft are flown frequently and randomly from multiple fields, making them less vulnerable to drone strikes.

FMI: https://gur.gov.ua/en.html

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Bob Hoover At Airventure -- Flight Test and Military Service

From 2011 (YouTube Edition): Aviation's Greatest Living Legend Talks About His Life In Aviation (Part 5, Final) ANN is pleased to offer you yet another snippet from the public conv>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.12.25)

“All Air Traffic Controllers must get back to work, NOW!!! Anyone who doesn’t will be substantially ‘docked. For those Air Traffic Controllers who were GREAT PATR>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.12.25)

Aero Linx: American Navion Society Welcome to the American Navion Society. Your society is here to support the Navion community. We are your source of technical and operating infor>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.12.25): Glideslope Intercept Altitude

Glideslope Intercept Altitude The published minimum altitude to intercept the glideslope in the intermediate segment of an instrument approach. Government charts use the lightning >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC