JetSuiteX Pushing Forward Despite Santa Monica Foot-Dragging | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Jan 28, 2017

JetSuiteX Pushing Forward Despite Santa Monica Foot-Dragging

Low-Fare Flights Will Begin On Schedule Feb 6, CEO Says

With or without permission from the City of Santa Monica, JetSuiteX plans to begin scheduled operations out of Santa Monica Airport (KSMO) on February 6.

That's the position of JetSuite CEO Alex Wilcox, who says that the company has "a federal right to operate" to and from KSMO even if the city does not grant the company a certificate for such operations.

The city, however, says JetSuiteX is selling tickets for a service that they legally have no right to offer.

The southern California newspaper The Argonaut reports that JetSuiteX will operate as a "public charter" as allowed in Part 135 of the FARs. That is different from a commercial operation. The company made that distinction to KSMO manager Stelios Makrides in a letter dated January 17, which prompted a closed-door meeting between the city council and the city's interim attorney.

While no action was taken at that meeting, Santa Monica City Manager Rick Cole said that the city plans to "vigorously work to keep them from beginning what we consider — until a [commercial] permit is considered — an illegal operation.”

Cole said that the "opinion" of the company is moot. "We are the regulatory body and they don't have a permit," Cole said. The city says it has not approved the permit on the grounds that JetSuite provided "incomplete information" in its application.

The FAA hasn't been much help. They sent a one-line response to various requests for clarification. The agency said in the brief statement that its role "is to ensure that airport sponsors comply with federal obligations,” citing the 20 pages of rules for "Assurances: Airport Sponsor" for grant recipients.

FMI: www.jetsuite.com, www.smgov.net/departments/cmo, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.27.25)

“Achieving PMA for the S-1200 Series magnetos is another step in expanding our commitment to providing the aviation community with the most trusted and durable ‘firewal>[...]

Airborne 11.26.25: Bonanza-Baron Fini, Archer v LA NIMBYs, Gogo Loses$$$

Also: Bell 505 on SAF, NYPA Gets Flak For BizAv 'Abuse', FAA Venezuela Caution, Horizon Update Textron Aviation has confirmed it will be ending production of the Beechcraft Bonanza>[...]

FAA Seeks Info For New Brand-New ATC Platform

State-Of-The-Art Common Automation Platform To Replace Legacy Systems The FAA has issued a Request for Information (RFI) regarding the initiative of the Trump Administration and U.>[...]

USAF Reaper Drone Crashes Off the South Korean Coast

Kunsan Air Base Reported the Accident During Routine Operations The US Air Force has confirmed that it lost an MQ-9 Reaper drone to the South Korean waters on November 24. The airc>[...]

Hartzell Engine Tech Magneto Gains FAA-PMA

PowerUp S-1200 Series Approved, Available for 4- And 6-Cylinder Engines Hartzell Engine Tech announced it received FAA Parts Manufacturer Approval for its PowerUp S-1200 Series air>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC