FAA, CASA Airworthiness Directives Issued On A320 Nosegear | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
09.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-09.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-09.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-09.12.25

Thu, Nov 24, 2005

FAA, CASA Airworthiness Directives Issued On A320 Nosegear

Agencies: Past Incidents Underscore Need For Inspections

As regular Aero-News readers know, there have been as many as seven incidents reported where the nosewheels on Airbus A320-series airlines have become jammed at a 90-degree angle, leading to some rather spectacular landings -- televised, or not.

It is both amazing, and also not so much, that none of these incidents has led to any injuries (excepting, of course, the nosewheel assemblies of the affected jets.) Amazing, because in each of these examples the pilots brought their wounded aircraft in for relatively routine (albeit theatrically brilliant) landings. Some sparks, burned rubber, and melted magnesium -- that's pretty much it.

The reason such feats aren't amazing, is because they're exactly why commercial airline pilots train as long, as intensively, and as expensively as they do: for that one time in a million when such scenarios are no longer academic exercises, but instead real-life situations. Each of those cases was an example of expert communication, professional piloting, and old-fashioned by-the-book problem-solving skill. Monday's televised drama in Hillsboro involving a Nike Corporation Gulfstream V was another example of this.

Still, clearly there is some kind of issue with the A320s nose landing gear (NLG) assembly -- or more specifically, with a specific component of it. In response, the FAA and the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) both issued Airworthiness Directives Wednesday for the A320, both for the same component.

Each AD requires operators to check the NLG upper support arms on all A318, A319, A320, and A321 airplanes. According to the agencies, these arms may have been improperly connected after installation of a certain type of braking and steering control unit -- which could result in yet another spark-filled landing down the line.

Aero-News presents these airworthiness directives -- as we do with all AD's -- both as a service to our readers in the affected areas of the aviation community, as well as to educate those interested in how such procedures are identified and implemented.

Just because you fly a Skyhawk, and not an airliner, doesn't necessarily mean you can't learn something...

AD: Airbus

AD NUMBER: 2005-24-06
MANUFACTURER: Airbus
SUBJECT: Airworthiness Directive 2005-24-06
SUMMARY:
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318-100, A319-100,A320-200, A321-100, and A321-200 series airplanes, and Model A320-111 airplanes. This AD requires an inspection to determine whether certain braking and steering control units (BSCUs) are installed or have ever been installed. For airplanes on which certain BSCUs are installed or have ever been installed, this AD requires an inspection of the nose landing gear (NLG) upper support and corrective action if necessary, and a check of the NLG strut inflation pressure and an adjustment if necessary. For some of these airplanes, this AD also requires a revision to the aircraft flight manual to incorporate an operating procedure to recover normal steering in the event of a steering failure. This AD results from a report of an incident where an airplane landed with the NLG turned 90 degrees from centerline. We are issuing this AD to prevent landings with the NLG turned 90 degrees from centerline, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.

Urgent CASA AD: Airbus

Applicability: AIRBUS A318, A319, A320 and A321 aircraft that are equipped with a Braking and Steering Control Unit (BSCU) part number (PN) E21327001 (Standard L4.1,
AIRBUS Modification 26965 - Service Bulletin A320-32-1912) or PN E21327003
(Standard L4.5, AIRBUS Modification 33376 - Service Bulletin A320-32-1261).

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is not applicable to aircraft that have been delivered and equipped with BSCU standard L4.8 from production incorporating modification 35216.

Requirement: 1. The following operational procedure is only for those aircraft that have not incorporated AIRBUS modification 31152 in production (i.e. applicable only to aircraft with the steering powered by the green hydraulic system).
Incorporate the following into in the Aircraft Operations Manual, or AFM TR 4.02.00/33 for aircraft without FWC H2E3P or H1E3P or subsequent standard, or TR 4.02.00/34 for aircraft with FWC H2E3P or H1E3P.
The ECAM message, in case of a nose wheel steering failure, will be worded as follows:
- “WHEEL N/W STRG FAULT” for aircraft with FWC software post E3P
- “WHEEL N.W STEER FAULT” for aircraft with FWC software pre E3P

If the L/G SHOCK ABSORBER FAULT ECAM caution is triggered at any time in flight, and the WHEEL N/W STRG FAULT ECAM caution is triggered after the landing gear extension:

• When all landing gear doors are indicated closed on ECAMWHEEL page, reset the BSCU:
- A/SKID&N/W STRG---------------------------OFF THEN ON
• If the WHEEL N/W STRG FAULT ECAM caution is no longer displayed, this indicates a successful nose wheel re-centering and steering recovery.
- Rearm the AUTO BRAKE, if necessary.
• If the WHEEL N/W STRG FAULT ECAM caution remains displayed, this indicates that the nose wheel steering remains lost, and that the nose wheels are not centered.
- During landing, delay nose wheel touchdown for as long as possible.
- Refer to the ECAM STATUS
If the WHEEL N/W STRG FAULT ECAM caution appears, without the L/G SHOCK ABSORBER FAULT ECAM caution:
- No specific crew action is requested by the WHEEL N/M STRG FAULT ECAM caution procedure.
- Refer to the ECAM STATUS

2. Check the NLG strut inflation pressure, weight off and weight on wheels, in accordance with AIRBUS Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) 12-14-32 and its associated TR issued on 13 November 2005; and perform a one time boroscopic inspection of the NLG upper support (backplate) to detect anti-rotation lugs ruptured (completely broken), in accordance with AIRBUS Technical Note 957.1901/05, dated 18 October 2005; and Report the results of all inspections to AIRBUS.
3. If any upper support anti-rotation lugs are found ruptured (completely broken), carry out all necessary actions to get a serviceable NLG (contact AIRBUS Fax: 33 5 61 93 32 73).
Note: DGAC AD F-2005-191 EASA reference No 2005-6411 dated 15 November 2005 refers.

Compliance: 1. From the effective date of this AD.

2. Within 100 flight cycles following an ECAM caution ‘L/G SHOCK ABSORBER FAULT’ associated with at least one of the following Centralised Fault Display System (CFDS) messages:

‘N L/G EXT PROX SNSR 24GA TGT POS’,
‘N L/G EXT PROX SNSR 25GA TGT POS’,
‘N L/G SHOCK ABSORBER FAULT 2526GM’.

3. Before further flight

This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 5 December 2005.

Background: An event where an A320 landed with the Nose Landing Gear (NLG) wheels rotated at 90 degrees to the aircraft centreline was recently reported. Investigation showed that the upper support of the NLG shock absorber was damaged and the anti- rotation lugs were ruptured. This led the nose wheels to lose their centered position reference normally ensured by the shock-absorber cams. The BSCU had logged a steering system fault, because hydraulic power was not available at the time of steering system checks, therefore the BSCU was not able to proceed with the re-centering of the wheels.

To prevent reoccurrence of landings with the NLG turned 90 degrees, this AD introduces operational procedures and maintenance actions.

FMI: www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/airworthiness_directives/, www.casa.gov.au

 


Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Evektor-Aerotechnik A S Harmony LSA

Improper Installation Of The Fuel Line That Connected The Fuel Pump To The Four-Way Distributor Analysis: The airplane was on the final leg of a flight to reposition it to its home>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (09.15.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.15.25)

“With the arrival of the second B-21 Raider, our flight test campaign gains substantial momentum. We can now expedite critical evaluations of mission systems and weapons capa>[...]

Airborne 09.12.25: Bristell Cert, Jetson ONE Delivery, GAMA Sales Report

Also: Potential Mars Biosignature, Boeing August Deliveries, JetBlue Retires Final E190, Av Safety Awareness Czech plane maker Bristell was awarded its first FAA Type Certification>[...]

Airborne 09.10.25: 1000 Hr B29 Pilot, Airplane Pile-Up, Haitian Restrictions

Also: Commercial A/C Certification, GMR Adds More Bell 429s, Helo Denial, John “Lucky” Luckadoo Flies West CAF’s Col. Mark Novak has accumulated more than 1,000 f>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC