Chicago Drone Pilot Wins Case Against The City | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Thu, Aug 17, 2017

Chicago Drone Pilot Wins Case Against The City

Licensed Part 107 Operator Was Cited By The City

A drone operator with a Part 107 license was recently cited by the City of Chicago for flying his aircraft over people without their consent ... except that it didn't happen.

On the Drone Law Blog, attorney Jeffrey Antonelli describes the case against Jerrick Hakim, who made one flight on Chicago's lakefront several hundred feet from shore. When stopped by the police, he pointed to the section of Chicago's drone law which says it does not apply to those flying with an FAA license. But the police reportedly assumed that, because there were a lot of people on the waterfront, he must have violated the ordinance by flying over them without their permission.

That was not the case. No witnesses said that he had, and the observation by the police of pedestrians on the lakefront path had been made some time after the flight occurred. Despite cooperating with the police, his possession of a license, and no witnesses against him, he was ticketed and had to go to court.

Antonelli's firm represented Mr. Hakim, and won. They believe it is the first time that the city has prosecuted an FAA licensed commercial drone pilot.

Antonelli writes that the citation should not have been issued in the first place. And that the case shows a failure of national drone policy. He also holds that the Chicago ordinance is largely, if not entirely preempted by federal law. And, he says, there are "countless" states, cities and towns who are overstepping their authority in creating drone regulations. The entire article is worth reading.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original article

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.10.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cessna 172

The Airplane Came To Rest Underneath A Set Of Damaged Power Distribution Lines On The Floor Of A Coulee On June 19, 2025, at 1412 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 172K airplane, N7>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.10.25)

Aero Linx: FAA Managers Association (FAAMA) Recognized by the FAA, FAAMA is a professional association dedicated to the promotion of excellence in public service. The Association i>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Big Business of Diminutive Powerplants

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Jet Central Micro-Turbine Engines Impress Founded in the late-1990s, Mexico City-based Jet Central produces a unique and fascinating line of micro-turb>[...]

Airborne 07.11.25: New FAA Bos, New NASA Boss (Kinda), WB57s Over TX

Also: ANOTHER Illegal Drone, KidVenture Educational Activities, Record Launches, TSA v Shoes The Senate confirmed Bryan Bedford to become the next Administrator of the FAA, in a ne>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC